Alabama Politics in
Doc’s Political Parlor
& Home of Lawn Mower Repair

June 9, 2009

Voter Suppression Flier in SD-7

Filed under: AL Senate, Campaign & Election, Top 10, AL Issues — Danny @ 4:34 pm

A reader faxed me a grainy copy of a voter suppression flier in SD-7. Click on it to see a larger copy.

Here’s the text:

Office of the Secretary of Electoral Elections
The Honorable Marion S. Barber
secretaryofelectoralelection@alabama.gov

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

DUE TO HIGH TURNOUT POLLING PLACES IN DISTRICT 7 TO OPERATE FOR TWO DAYS, ONE FOR EACH CANDIDATE

MONTGOMERY, AL - Alabama Secretary of Electoral Elections Marion S. Barber has decided due to heavy expected turnout in the 7th State Senate District race between State Rep. Laura Hall and Paul Sanford that there will be two days of voting in Madison County.

A coin flip took place at Huntsville City Hall at 5AM on Tuesday and Paul Sanford won the ability to have his voters go to the polls on Tuesday June 9th and Laura Hall’s voters should go to the polls on Wednesday June 10th.

Secretary Barber stated, “This is necessary due to the unexpected turnout in an election where we planned for low turnout.” She added, “We hope this doesn’t cause problems in Madison County but feel this is the best way to accommodate our voters.[”]

Click on the flier below to see an larger copy.

Voter Suppression Flier in SD-7

If you or someone you know got one of these fliers, I’d be interested to know how it was received. Are these being passed along from friend to friend? Left under car windshields? It’s hard to imagine that the Secretary of State would get involved if this was simply a joke on a small scale.

Related Articles:

May 15, 2009

Alabama’s Most Statesmanlike Legislators

Filed under: AL Senate, AL House, Top 10 — Danny @ 9:51 am

Who are Alabama’s most statesmanlike legislators?

Alabama House of RepresentativesI put that question to a broad range of politicos who have first hand experience with our state legislature - including Senators, Representatives, lobbyists, and other Montgomery insiders. While they were free to interpret “statesmanlike” as they wished, I suggested that it is marked by class, dignity, and a willingness to put good public policy above partisan politics.

Most enthusiastically participated, though many contributors echoed the sentiment of one legislator who told me, “Please keep my reply anonymous. I have to work with the others [that are not on his list].”

A legislator who previewed this list told me, “Probably as good a list as you can come up with. Like all humans, each have great strong points and some weaknesses. Thank you for taking time to point out there are a few good ones up here on Goat Hill.”

Many contributors did not offer comments, but I included some remarks from those who did.

On with the list…

House Dems

(more…)

December 25, 2008

Christmas Wishes Around the State This Morning

Filed under: Top 10, Misc. AL Politics — Danny @ 8:01 am

What are Alabama politicos hoping the jolly old elf brings them? Santa’s helpers and Political Parlor elves around the state reported in.

Christmas lights

Political Parlor’s
Twelve Christmas Wishes in Alabama Politics

12.  ACCR and many newspapers - among others - want to see last rites administered to our state’s 1901 Constitution.

11.  Jefferson County Commissioners Bobby Humphries and Jim Carns hope that Santa Claus, or ummm… Santa Bettye, could find them just one good committee.

10.  Jim Folsom would be happy for Artur Davis to receive an appointment in Obama’s administration. (While we’re touching on the subject of potential new governors, you know who really needs a new governor this Christmas? Lowell Barron’s car.)

Full Christmas stocking

 9.  While many are feasting on federal handouts this Christmas, all-but-bankrupt Jefferson County would savor even crumbs.

 8.  Don Siegelman? A presidential pardon. And the vanquishing of his political opponents.

 7.  Randy Hinshaw would like an extra voting machine on the state House floor.

 6.  Charles Barkley wants the pesky seven year residency requirement for gubernatorial candidates removed in time for the 2010 election.

 5.  Larry Langford simply wants his debts retired scrutiny-free.

 4.  Alabama State University wants velcro letters on its buildings so they may be easily renamed.

 3.  Harri Anne Smith would like a copy of “Twinkle Cavanaugh’s Guide to Political Falls and Soft Landings.”

 2.  Parker Griffith wants a document shredder for Huntsville Hospital.

 1.  Rep. Spencer Collier? A merry Christmas and a happy new ear.

Here’s hoping that you were able to make a holiday wish come true for someone close to you, and that maybe you realized one of your own.

Wishing you all the best this season.

April 1, 2008

Red and Blue Songs

Filed under: Top 10, Off-Topic — Danny @ 11:23 am

Top 10 Red and Blue SongsI enjoyed the article in yesterday’s Press-Register from Sebastian Kitchen about the “group of lawmakers singing and playing country, rock and bluegrass music at the Goat Hill Tavern” on Wednesday nights.

Being that it is a bi-partisan group, I wondered what blue or red songs they might include in their playlist.

So here you go…

Top Ten Red and Blue Songs

10.  “Don’t It Make My Brown Eyes Blue” - Back when pop radio played country songs, this Crystal Gayle song went to #1 on the country chart and #2 on the pop chart.

 9.  “Little Red Corvette” - This song was a first introduction to Prince for many.

 8.  “Red Headed Stranger” - Title track of Willie Nelson’s multi-platinum blockbuster album which also has the list-appropriate “Blue Eyes Crying in the Rain.”

 7.  “Blue Moon” - The Rodgers and Hart ballad is probably known more widely as a doo-wop ballad by the Marcels.

 6.  “Blue Bayou” - The Roy Orbison original and the Linda Ronstadt cover are both terrific.

 5.  “99 Red Balloons” - No doubt the catchiest song ever written about the Cold War. The song was a hit for Nena in its original German and later in English.

 4.  “Blue Suede Shoes” - Sun Records’ 1st million-seller was a chart-topper for Carl Perkins. Many remember it for Elvis Presley’s later version.

 3.  “Red Red Wine” - Neil Diamond’s song is probably remembered more for the reggae version recorded by UB40. The B-side of Diamond’s original was a cover of the list-appropriate “Red Rubber Ball,” a personal favorite co-written by Paul Simon for The Cyrkle.

 2.  “Lil’ Red Riding Hood” - The follow-up to “Wooly Bully” for Sam the Sham and the Pharaohs

 1.  “Devil with the Blue Dress On” - The most famous version is the medley with “Good Golly Miss Molly” recorded by Mitch Ryder and the Detroit Wheels.

Honorable Mention by Category:

Wardrobe - “Lady in Red” and “(She Wore) Blue Velvet”

Christmas - “Blue Christmas” and “Rudolph the Red-Nosed Reindeer”

Neil Diamond (again) - “Song Sung Blue” and “Forever in Blue Jeans”

Miscellaneous - “Snoopy vs. the Red Baron” (a personal favorite), “Mr. Blue Sky,” “Suite: Judy Blue Eyes,” “Crystal Blue Persuasion” and “Bluer than Blue.”

March 14, 2008

Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians - Complete

Filed under: Top 10, Misc. AL Politics — Danny @ 11:41 am

Most InfluentialFor ease of viewing the whole list and for future reference, here is our complete list of the Top 40 Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians that the Parlor has been posting in pieces this week.

You may enjoy reading the comments already made on the previous posts (The first post with numbers 31-40 is here, 21-30 here, 11-20 here, and the Top Ten). If this post happens to be the first you have read of this list, then you may particularly enjoy reading the introduction. The introduction explains a bit about the criteria involved and how it came to be that, except for the Top Ten, the list is presented in unranked tiers of ten names.

Here is the complete list.


Top 40 Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians

(more…)

Related Articles:

March 13, 2008

Top 40 Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians, Part 4

Filed under: Top 10, Misc. AL Politics — Danny @ 8:19 am

Again, I am grateful to the many political insiders on both sides of the aisle who freely gave time and input to putting together this list of non-elected Alabamians who most influence Alabama politics and policy. Time and time again I would go back to them, saying, “Help me understand how this person wields influence.” Or, “What about this name? Should this name be included?” Each contributor’s own list would look at least a little different, but their collective input shaped the list we have here, and I appreciate the considerable time and interest they gave to this.

The introduction to the list is here. Numbers 31-40 are here, numbers 21-30 are here, and numbers 11-20 are here.


#1 - #10 of the
Top 40 Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians

10.  Jere Beasley –The former Democratic Lt Governor and nationally prominent plaintiff’s attorney virtually bankrolls Alabama trial lawyers’ political efforts out of his firm’s coffers, Most Influentialbut has good relationships across the aisle, e.g. with Troy King and Rob Riley.

 9.  Jerry Newby – The head of ALFA which plays hard and heavy in a lot of Alabama elections and policy battles, probably the second most powerful interest group after AEA.

 8.  Bradley Byrne – Chancellor of the Two-Year College System is a powerful job in charge of dozens of campuses across the state; Byrne is an aggressive leader in the role with an eye on an even more powerful post.

 7.  David Bronner – The head of Retirement Systems of Alabama (RSA) handles billions of dollars every day and pretty much gets what he wants out of state government.

 6.  Bill Canary - The President of the Business Council of Alabama is arguably Gov. Riley’s closest ally, and BCA is in the thick of many political scrums.

 5.  Fine & Geddie – Joe Fine and Bob Geddie are the two most powerful contract lobbyists in Alabama. Period. Just check out their client list sometime.

 4.  Rob and Minda Riley – Folks on both sides of the aisle acknowledge the Govlings’ considerable influence on their father’s administration.

 3.  Charles McCrary – He’s the CEO of Alabama Power, the single most powerful company in Alabama politics. Other companies trail far behind in their political influence.

 2.  Jim Main – The state Finance Director oversees large sums of money, contracts, the state’s moneyed interests. Less experienced legislators try to see the Governor about advancing their cause; budget chairmen and those in the know see Jim Main.

 1.  Paul Hubbert – The head of the Alabama Education Association and legislative puppet-master was a unanimous choice for #1 among contributors. “The most powerful man in the state, no one else is close,” said one contributor.


How would your list look different? Are there egregious errors here? Notable omissions?

Related Articles:

March 12, 2008

Top 40 Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians, Part 3

Filed under: Top 10, Misc. AL Politics — Danny @ 10:17 am

Insiders immersed in Alabama politics helped the Parlor create the list of the Top 40 Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians in the realm of state politics and policy. Who are the folks who can pick up the ball on a policy proposal and move it down the field?

Numbers 31-40 are here, and 21-30 are here. The first three tiers or groups of ten are presented unranked within those groups; a little more about that can be found here in the introduction.

We are up to numbers 11 to 20.


#11 - #20 of the
Top 40 Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians
(Alphabetical Order)

    Most Influential
  • Tom Hamby - The head of BellSouth Alabama has a powerful personality and works very aggressively in the policy arena.
  • Johnny Johns - The head honcho of Protective Life Alabama is part of the business triumvirate (with McCrary and Hamby) that has the loudest private sector voice in Alabama’s business policy.
  • Mac McArthur - The Alabama State Employees’ Association is the second most powerful union in the state, and their Executive Director, who was once thought to have his own statewide ambitions, is an incredibly influential personality with friends on both sides of the aisle
  • Milton McGregor - Gambling magnate makes money hand over fist in a capacity that most people think is illegal to do in the state. Uses it to influence politics, and as one contributor said, “Lord knows he’s aggressive.”
  • Bill O’Connor - Former BCA President is now the right hand of Speaker of the House Seth Hammett.
  • Joe Perkins - The Matrix founder is a legendary figure with a fearsome reputation among Alabama politicos; works in the shadows. Probably at his zenith of influence in the Siegelman years, still very close to the House Speaker and is a consultant to many CEOs.
  • Steve Raby - Former Heflin Chief of Staff and Democratic consultant is “Lowell Barron’s guy” and has the ear of Paul Hubbert. Runs the Senate races for the majority and is the GOTV guru for Alabama Dems.
  • Joe Reed - The #2 man at AEA and leader of the Alabama Democratic Conference is not as powerful as he once was, but still extremely influential in his spheres.
  • Julian Smith - One of the most powerful and least known lobbyists in Alabama. He has been with political heavyweight Alabama Power for decades.
  • Steve Windom - In addition to having served as Lt. Governor and State Senator (which comes with residual influence), he has raised large sums of money for candidates across the state. Very close to Governor Riley but on good terms with Democratic legislators as well.

Top Ten tomorrow.

Related Articles:

March 11, 2008

Top 40 Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians, Part 2

Filed under: Top 10, Misc. AL Politics — Danny @ 9:37 am

Many political insiders of all stripes and types helped the Parlor create a list of Alabama’s Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians in the realm of state politics and policy. These are the folks you most want on your side when you want a champion for your policy idea.

The introduction is here, and Part One is here. Plus, a reminder that the list is presented in groups of ten, but unranked within those tiers except for the top ten.

On to Part Two…


#21 - #30 of the
Top 40 Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians
(Alphabetical Order)

    Most Influential
  • Bill Blount - All hands describe the bond broker and former Democratic Party Chair the same way, “He’s [Birmingham Mayor] Larry Langford’s guy.” Langford, Langford, Langford.
  • Tom Coker - One of the more powerful contract lobbyists in Montgomery.
  • Peck Fox - Former Folsom Chief of Staff and current top “political guy” for Lt. Gov. Jim Folsom. Not a weak place to be.
  • Jack Hawkins - Troy University Chancellor has worked hard to gain the attention and respect of many in Montgomery including Republicans and Democrats.
  • Quentin Riggins - Has become very influential at the Business Council of Alabama. Worked as legislative liaison for two governors (Riley and James) and legislative analyst for House Speaker Seth Hammett.
  • Dowd Ritter - The head of Regions Financial Corporation easily leads the second tier of Birmingham CEOs who are active in Alabama policy and politics.
  • Dave Stewart - He runs the Office of the Governor and in this case - Policy. Makes most decisions in the Governor’s office that Riley doesn’t.
  • John Teague - Ex-state senator who, like Coker, tends to get what he wants for his clients. Has a wide array of clients and associates.
  • Neil Wade - Director of the Alabama Development Office while Alabama’s reputation as a desirable location for business and industry has grown by leaps and bounds.
  • Jim Williams -The Executive Director of the Public Affairs Research Council of Alabama (PARCA) has become one of the most influential policy people in the state. He has the ear of many in Alabama, including the current Administration.

Part Three tomorrow.

Related Articles:

March 10, 2008

Top 40 Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians, Part 1

Filed under: Top 10, Misc. AL Politics — Danny @ 9:27 am

Who are the most influential, non-elected Alabamians in the realm of Alabama politics and policy?

Who can pick up the ball on an idea and move it down the field? Who are the movers and shakers that make things happen? Who has influence and wields it in the arena of politics and policy?

This earlier introduction explains a bit more about the process - including that the list will be in unranked tiers of ten except for the last ten which will be ranked.


#31 - #40 of the
Top 40 Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians
(Alphabetical Order)

    Most Influential
  • John Anzalone - The Democratic pollster has done work with Alabama Democrats at all levels and prominent interest groups like the State Employees, trial lawyers, and even BCA, offering strategy on how to help with policy issues. Doesn’t help with this ranking, but he has more than a dozen members of Congress from other states among his clients. One contributor said, “If I were running a campaign, he would be my first call.”
  • Ginger Avery-Buckner - Longtime Executive Director for one of the more powerful interest groups in the state, the Alabama Association for Justice, formerly the Alabama Trial Lawyers Association, and is recognized nationally as one of the more experienced and effective state trial lawyer directors.
  • Brett Blackledge - The Birmingham News Pulitzer Prize winner is shaking up Alabama politics. Clearly important, would rate higher if he better fit the criteria, but instead divided the panel of contributors on whether he belonged on this list.
  • Randy Brinson - New-ish head of the Christian Coalition of Alabama flexed some muscle on behalf of Mike Huckabee’s presidential campaign. He’s expected to be influential in Alabama, and has bi-partisan ties that could transform the CCA from the Giles era.
  • Dan Ireland - Outgoing Executive Director of Alabama Citizens Action Program (ALCAP) and a leader among Baptists, influences some legislators.
  • Bobby Lowder - Colonial Bank founder and president is a force to be reckoned with when he’s engaged on an issue, but his interest in state politics waxes and wanes. Though not involved like he was in the late 90s, Lowder is still keeping a toe in the political waters.
  • Gary Palmer - A founder of the Alabama Policy Institute, he influences some individual legislators and is a staple of Alabama op-ed pages.
  • Dax Swatek - He’s the top establishment GOP consultant in the state and has the ear of Governor Riley, state party chair Mike Hubbard, and others.
  • Joe Turnham - The state Democratic Party Chair is only one of many at the reins of the ADP. Had a solid 2006 and may take one more stab at high office down the line.
  • Sharon Wheeler - She’s the top staffer to the Democratic Senate Caucus and very active in politics and policy. “Runs the Senate,” says one GOP’er.

Part Two tomorrow.

Related Articles:

Most Influential Non-Elected Alabamians, Introduction

Filed under: Top 10, Misc. AL Politics — Danny @ 8:51 am

Most InfluentialWho are the most influential, non-elected Alabamians in the realm of Alabama politics and policy?

Who can pick up the ball on an idea and move it down the field? Who are the movers and shakers that make things happen? Who has influence and wields it in the arena of politics and policy?

I solicited input from a broad range of elected officials representing every branch of government and political insiders including lobbyists, consultants, policy folks, and party people. This list and its comments could not have been made without their considerable input, and I thank them. Almost 20 people in all contributed, and this list is their product.

A caveat for your consideration: One lobbyist told me that no matter how good the list is, there is probably someone in the shadows pulling some strings that no one knows about.

That said, let’s get on with what we have.

The list here will be in tiers of ten names but unranked within the tiers, except for the final ten which is ranked. Every contributor realized what a difficult task we had undertaken, and the idea behind ranking the names in tiers is that a discussion here of what is power in the realm of Alabama politics and policy, who has it, and how is it wielded in general terms seemed far more interesting than getting bogged down in an argument of whether John Somebody should be ranked 37th or 34th. As one contributor offered, “If the debate is over what tier a name belongs in, I think you’ll get more substantative debate about influence, strength, etc.”

Part One is next.

Related Articles:

December 19, 2007

Oh, Yeah! Christmas Wish List!

Filed under: Top 10, Misc. AL Politics — Danny @ 9:49 am

Santa’s helpers and Political Parlor elves around the state are reporting back what various folks in Alabama politics have on their Christmas wish lists. Without further ado, we are happy to present the Top Ten Christmas Wishes in Alabama Politics.

(Feel out of the loop? Click on the number for each item to be taken to a link that may provide some helpful background info for the item.)
 

Christmas lights

Political Parlor’s
Top Ten Christmas Wishes in Alabama Politics

10.  State Sen. Zeb Little hopes Santa Claus can get him a refund for all those "Sheila Kretzschmar for State House District 12" signs stacked up in his garage.

 9.  Gov. Bob Riley wants a longer coat. You know, one with tails.

 8.  Former Judge Herman Thomas has been bad this year, so all he gets is a paddle. Which actually kinda works out okay.Wrapped Christmas Presents

 7.  State Rep. Mickey Hammon wants Santa Claus to do his job and go back home.

 6.  Sen. Hinton Mitchem would like just one more teensy-weensy vote for his caucus.

 5.  Ron Sparks hopes Hillary will hire a male secretary - of Agriculture.

 4.  Sen. Scott Beason wants some evidence that Santa speaks English before he drives that sleigh around here.

 3.  State Finance Director (and Supreme Court hopeful) Jim Main hopes Santa can bring him a resume' that somehow, somehow, doesn’t have Beasley/Allen on it.

 2.  Partisans wish Peace On Earth, Goodwill to Men, except to those #%&&!!!s on the other side.

 1.  The state Senate wants a ban on Pac-to-Pac transfers. No, really, we mean it this time, Santa. Seriously. Santa?! Please! Wait! Listen! SANTA!


Haven’t had enough? Then check out the Second Ten Christmas Wishes in Alabama Politics! And more!

Many thanks to many contributors for the list.

Merry Christmas to you and all of yours!

June 25, 2007

Parlor’s Top 10 Memorable Moments of Session - Complete

Filed under: AL Senate, AL House, Top 10, AL Issues — Danny @ 2:41 pm

Below is the final list (Political Parlor’s Top 10 15 Most Memorable Moments of Session) gathered in one place. I would have enjoyed getting this out a little quicker without it dragging out as it did, but it’s all here.

Click on the #’s of the list to be taken to the original post for more elaboration on the items.


Political Parlor’s Top 10 15
Most Memorable Moments of Session

#15.  Favorite quote of the session.

#14.  Speaker of the House Seth Hammett restructures House Committees.

#13.  Sen. Bradley Byrne resigns.

#12.  Special session and constitutional amendment for industrial incentives

#11.  Mike Hubbard wears two big hats.

#10.  Blogging legislators.

 #9.  Apology for slavery.

 #8.  Constitution reaches 799 amendments.

 #7.  PAC-to-PAC transfer bill dies in Senate - again.

 #6.  Lt. Governor Jim Folsom breaks the Senate logjam.

 #5.  Sen. Poole’s payback.

 #4.  Senate shutdown.

 #3.  Democrats organize a Senate majority.

 #2.  The pay raise.

 #1.  The punch.


What is overlooked? What should merit at least an honorable mention? Would you put them in a different order? I would be interested to know.

Related Articles:

Top 10 Most Memorable Moments of Session (Part Five)

Filed under: AL Senate, Top 10 — Danny @ 11:27 am

Concluding the list of the Political Parlor’s top 15 most memorable moments of the legislative session…

Political Parlor’s Top 10 15
Most Memorable Moments of Session

Continued…

#1.

The punch. What else? They will be talking about this one for years to come. (Unless, of course, it’s overshadowed by a melee on the Senate floor next year.)

Sen. Charles Bishop (R - Arley) provided coarse bookends to this year’s Senate session. He started the session by referring to colleagues as “pinheads” and ended it with a bang - on Sen. Lowell Barron (D - Fyffe). Caught on videotape by Alabama Public Television, the punch has been seen over 150,000 times on YouTube in several uploaded videos. (See the video here.)

Bishop claimed that Barron’s use of an epithet provoked him. Senators present say they did not hear that, though all sides agree that Bishop himself was cursing. Bishop has said someone will corroborate what he claims Barron said, but so far no one has. As if all that mattered.

Bishop has a history of fights, near-fights, and threats. (A member of the Senate Leadership’s staff has provided a timeline.) When Bishop was running for the Senate in 2006, a lobbyist I know referred to him regularly as “the last Senator to take a swing at someone on the Senate floor” in reference to an earlier incident. Bishop has never apologized for hitting Barron, though he regrets it happened on the Senate floor.

The Senate Ethics and Conduct Committee will consider what consequence, if any, should follow.

Should Bishop step down? I don’t know. But if he were representing my district, I think I would prefer a new senator. Not simply because of the pattern of incivility shown by my elected official that has escalated into violence, but because I would want effective leadership for my district in the Senate for the next three years. The Rules Chair (i.e., Lowell Barron) is the last person in the Senate you want to engage in a grudge match. Will my district’s local legislation get a hearing if I am counting on Charles Bishop to get it through Lowell Barron’s Rules Committee?

This is not the most important moment of the session, but it is the most memorable by a longshot.


Sen. Charles Bishop punches Sen. Lowell Barron

Related Articles:

June 24, 2007

Top 10 Most Memorable Moments of Session (Part Four)

Filed under: AL Senate, AL House, Top 10, AL Issues — Danny @ 8:11 am

Winding down our list of the Political Parlor’s top 15 most memorable moments of the legislative session…

Political Parlor’s Top 10 15
Most Memorable Moments of Session

Continued…

#3.

Democrats organize a Senate majority. Over a year ago, before the primary elections, the Political Parlor identified the number one question on people’s minds about this session to be “who will control the state Senate?” Last year, the Senate Republicans were just short of the 21 votes necessary to re-organize the Senate in the middle of the quadrennium, but barring big changes, they would have the 18 votes needed to claim a majority at the beginning of a new quadrennium with the help of Democrats like Gerald Dial, Jimmy Holley, and Jim Preuitt.

Even though long-time incumbent Gerald Dial surprisingly lost a Democratic primary battle with newcomer Kim Benefield (aided by a campaign funds from the Democratic majority), the Republicans were reporting that they would have seven Democrats caucus with them to provide a 19-16 majority. Even the morning of the organizational session, the news reported that the the Republicans’ coalition was holding. Jim Preuitt (D - Talladega) was expected to be the President pro tem for the coalition and appeared confident that he had the votes. Gov. Riley reportedly was telling people that he had the votes.

Democrats Phil Poole (D - Moundville) and Rodger Smitherman (D - Birmingham) were expected to be two of the seven Democrats to side with the Republican coalition, but in an unexpected surprise to many senators, they voted with the Democrats.

For the third straight quadrennium, Republican Senators hoped to have enough Senate Democrats join them to form a majority only to fall short.

Coming oh-so-close and falling short can be a bitter disapointment. When your favorite team is blown out in the big game, you can only think, “Oh well, get’em next time.” But when your team loses the big game in a surprise on a last minute play, the disappointment is all the more keen as you dwell on what might have happened differently. Sen. Lowell Barron (D - Fyffe) suggested in a recent interview that a similar dynamic may be at work with Senate Republicans, “They already were organized but when it didn’t happen, I think they’re struggling with they can’t let it go.” I cannot help but wonder if the Senate Republicans’ frustration at the Democrats’ operating rules has been exacerbated by their bitter disappointment at very nearly forming a majority coalition only to be denied at the last moment.

Regardless, the long anticipated question of who would control the Senate was answered by a surprising turn of events.

#2.

The pay raise. Legislators approved the first pay raise for themselves since 1991 on an unrecorded voice vote. The bill provides for annual adjustments for inflation in the future via the Consumer Price Index, so expect no more unseemly votes on the issue.

Many objected to the amount of the pay raise, from $30,410 to $49,250 or 62%, for part-time jobs. But almost everyone objected to the manner in which it was passed.

The House and then the Senate each approved the resolution on a voice vote in less than a minute, leaving little time for debate. Some senators said they wanted a written record of Wednesday’s vote but were denied one.

Sen. Ben Brooks was one of the senators who tried to protest.

Sen. Ben Brooks, R-Mobile, described the blinding pace of the legislative action: “I tried to yell ‘No’, but it was hard,” he said. “He may have gaveled before I got the word out of my mouth. It was that fast.”

However, Rep. Randy Hinshaw (D - Meridianville) reported here in the Parlor that every legislator and the Governor knew ahead of time the amount proposed for a pay raise and that a voice vote was coming. “Everyone knew it was coming. Very few seem to want to admit it.”

Editorials railed. Birmingham talk radio personality Matt Murphy organized a protest in Montgomery that was attended by 200 to 250 people, many of whom took off from work to express their objections at the rally.

The Governor’s veto meant that legislators would vote on the record. Both houses overrode the veto with votes to spare. Though some complained about the hurried pace of the original voice vote, there was no debate in the House and little in the Senate on the vote to override the veto. (Only two senators spoke against the pay raise.)

Some legislators have filled out paperwork to refuse the pay raise, and others have said they would give it to charity.

The unproductive legislative session due largely to the Senate shutdown has made the pay raise appear all the more undeserved.

Gary Palmer echoed the feeling many of irate Alabamians when he wrote, “One thing that voters will not forget is the 62 percent pay raise.” But three years in the political realm is a long time.

To be continued…

Related Articles:

June 21, 2007

Top 10 Most Memorable Moments of Session (Part Three)

Filed under: AL Senate, Top 10, AL Executive Branch — Danny @ 9:31 am

Counting down the Parlor’s top 15 most memorable moments of the legislative session…

Political Parlor’s Top 10 15
Most Memorable Moments of Session

Continued…

#6.

Lt. Governor Jim Folsom breaks the Senate logjam. The Senate minority caucus, unhappy with the Senate rules, had shut down the Senate for weeks. Democrats in the state Senate had attempted to pass two sunset bills 460 times in this session so that it could move on to the state budgets and other items.

As long as either sunset bill was up for debate, no other bill could be considered without 60% of voting senators agreeing. Lt. Governor Jim Folsom, later citing the constitution’s language that “the budget was the paramount duty of the legislature,” allowed the sunset bills to be postponed indefinitely by an 18-17 vote. The minority caucus disagreed with Folsom over the legality of his action and spoke of taking the matter to court.

On the 27th day out of 30 possible in the session, the Senate began to consider the budget.

To have been such a brouhaha at the time, the matter quieted down rather quickly as the Senate got to work (and later passed the sunset bills). Some will ultimately say the Lt. Governor showed decisive leadership in moving the Senate forward in its duty. Others will feel that he has contributed even further to bitter acrimony in the Senate.

The Anniston Star:

It was not the way we would have wanted the stalemate ended. But considering the alternative — protracted special sessions, the decisions of school superintendents in limbo, agencies unable to plan for next year, teachers pink-slipped, skilled employees looking for other jobs — it might prove to be the best of a bunch of bad solutions.

In the end, a lot of good legislation did not get the hearing it deserved.

#5.

Sen. Poole’s payback. There are really three paybacks at work here. Payback to Poole by the Senate, payback by the Governor, and payback by Poole.

Sen. Phil Poole (D - Moundville) switched his vote in the organizing session at the 11th hour (along with Rodger Smitherman, D - Birmingham) to give the Democratic caucus another Senate majority. Part of his payback was going to be $1 million in road projects for Tuscaloosa County. On the last day of the session, Republican Governor Riley dusted off the rarely used line-item veto and struck the earmark. (The $1 million remained in ADECA’s budget.)

After the veto was upheld in the House, Sen. Poole had his own payback by effectively killing in the Senate any bill by any House member who voted with the Governor.

Ugly politics all around.

Two Birmingham News editorials (”Riley’s remarkable roundhouse” and “Poole’s pound of flesh“) tell the story more fully.

#4.

Senate shutdown.

The Senate minority caucus of 12 Republicans and 5 Democrats fell a vote shy of organizing as the majority in the organizing session. The Democratic majority passed organizing rules that the minority felt were unfair, in that they “allowed for the majority to have an ironclad filibuster-proof control over the Senate.”

Mobile’s Press-Register:

Two of the rules of most concern are those allowing 18 senators, instead of the previous 21, to vote to stop debate on redistricting and on budgets, and another mandating roll call votes only when three senators request it. Before those rules were adopted in January, six senators could sign a document at the beginning of each legislative day asking for a roll call vote for the entire day.

With the rare exception (e.g., the pay raise and the ThyssenKrupp incentives), the Senate was completely shutdown for 26 of the 30 meeting days until Lt. Governor Folsom and the Democrats postponed indefinitely the sunset bills that were damming the process, as mentioned above.

One point I made previously… The Senate minority caucus came close enough to being the majority that they would have had their own proposed operating rules prepared. If the minority caucus had demonstrated by releasing their own rules that they were taking a high road with proposed rules that were more fair, the caucus would have nailed down its argument that the Democrats’ rules were unreasonable.

To be continued…

Related Articles:

June 20, 2007

Top 10 Most Memorable Moments of Session (Part Two)

Filed under: AL House, Top 10, AL Issues — Danny @ 8:31 am

Continuing the fun, here are more of the Parlor’s top 15 most memorable moments of the legislative session…

Political Parlor’s Top 10 15
Most Memorable Moments of Session

Continued…

#10.

Blogging legislators. Rep. Randy Hinshaw (D - Meridianville) and Rep. Cam Ward (R - Alabaster) agreed to blog here at the Political Parlor for the duration of the legislative session. Soon after, Rep. Mike Ball (R - Huntsville) and Rep. Patricia Todd (D - Birmingham) agreed to follow suit at Between the Links and Birmingham Blues, respectively. The legislators accepted the challenge with candor and grace. The Huntsville Times took notice with a big article on a Sunday in March (though it inexplicably misidentified the owner of this blog).

Thanks, Representatives Hinshaw, Ward, Ball, and Todd, for insiders’ perspectives. More information is good.

#9.

Apology for slavery. The legislature passed an apology for slavery. (Full text of apology here.) More Alabamians would benefit more from an increase in minimum wage for the first time in ten years, a tax structure that doesn’t tax the working-poor at a rate higher than any other state’s (pdf), or a state constitution that enabled good government instead of shackling it. But we didn’t get those things. We got the apology, and that had its own importance.

#8.

Constitution reaches 799 amendments. The longest constitution in the world got longer by five amendments passed this year by the legislature and then by a majority of the 9.6% of the voters who turned out. How many times would you fix your car before you decided you should start over with a new one?

#7.

PAC-to-PAC transfer bill dies in Senate - again. A bill to ban PAC-to-PAC transfers has passed the House for five consecutive years. Because both parties declared legislative platforms that supported passage of the bill, surely the sixth time would be the charm. No.

The bill to ban PAC-to-PAC transfers has become a symbol, a symbol of the legislature’s inability to give the people what they want (and to follow through on what the legislature says it wants), a symbol of the state government’s unwillingness to deny campaigns one of the washing machines used to launder campaign donations.

The papers and the blogs bemoan the death of the bill. Every year we excitedly run toward it like Charlie Brown getting ready to kick the football at last, but every year the Senate plays the role of Lucy, jerking it away from us. It’s not as if the bill is the end-all, the Holy Grail, the magic that will make all state politics good, just, and transparent, but it is a small positive step that continues to elude us.

The word is that there will be a legislative special session in the fall dealing with issues of ethics and transparency. Perhaps Lucy will bring the football.

To be continued…

Related Articles:

June 19, 2007

Top 10 Most Memorable Moments of Session (Part One)

Filed under: AL Senate, AL House, Top 10, Party Politics — Danny @ 1:59 pm

This year’s legislative session is behind us, and so, just for fun, here are the Parlor’s Top 10, er… 15, most memorable moments of the legislative session. Or at least a start…

Political Parlor’s Top 10 15
Most Memorable Moments of Session

#15.

Favorite quote of the session. The Parlor’s favorite quote of the session comes from Rep. Duwayne Bridges (R - Valley): “You’re wrong. I don’t know what you said, but you’re wrong.” You can hear the audio here at Between the Links (with about 42 seconds left in the recording).

#14.

Speaker of the House Seth Hammett restructures House Committees. Hammett (D - Andalusia) shook up the committees when organizing for the new quadrennium. Some important committees, e.g. Rules and Education Appropriations, had only five Republicans and twice as many Democrats. House Minority Leader Mike Hubbard (R - Auburn) was not re-appointed to the Education Appropriations Committee, an important one to Hubbard’s hometown university.

On this subject, Friday night at the Red State Summer Dinner, a GOP House member told me, “I know I am supposed to be all partisan about this, but if we were in the majority, we’d be doing this to the Democrats.”

#13.

Sen. Bradley Byrne resigns. Sen. Bradley Byrne (R - Fairhope) resigned to accept Governor Riley’s appointment to clean up the two-year college scandals. Riley’s choice to stop the revolving door of leadership at the top of the two-year college program has been widely praised. Primary elections for the empty Senate seat will be August 7. Expect a Republican to fill the seat.

#12.

Special session and constitutional amendment for industrial incentives. A special session and a new constitutional amendment allow the state to sell up to $400 million in bonds to pay for industrial incentives, particularly for German steelmaker ThyssenKrupp AG who chose the Mobile area for a $3.7 billion steel plant. Which will probably happen, but

#11.

Mike Hubbard wears two big hats. Rep. Mike Hubbard (R - Auburn) serves in two high profile party roles as state GOP Party Chair and House Minority Leader.

To be continued…

Related Articles:

January 12, 2007

Top Ten Election Winners: #7

Filed under: Campaign & Election, Top 10, Local Politics — Danny @ 11:43 am

In the state’s November elections, some winners and losers are worth noting. In our Top 10 Winners, we are up to number seven.

#7. Jefferson County Democrats

#7If state Democrats were handed an election night bouquet representing net gains in county courthouses around the state, Jefferson County was one of the larger roses.

Jefferson County Republicans campaigned aggressively. GOP Sheriff Mike Hale’s radio ads wanted voters to vote straight Republican to clean up “dishonesty and corruption in the county.” Billboards urged voters to “vote straight Republican.” And they had high hopes for the coattails of a popular GOP governor who carried the county.

In the end, of 11 contested judicial races, the Republicans put up eight incumbents, lost three of them, and did not win any of the open seats. The Democrats won six of the eleven races without even a single Democratic incumbent running to retain a seat. (Incumbents won the two non-judicial races: GOP Sheriff Mike Hale and Democratic Circuit Clerk Anne Marie Adams.)

The highest vote getter in the county in any race was Democrat Sherri Friday in Probate Court Place 2. (One Republican judge told a friend of mine, “You do not want to run against an over-the-mountain Democrat.”) At Probate Court Place 1, Riley appointee Mark Gaines fumbled so badly that the Birmingham News, who had endorsed him, editorialized that they were “deeply disappointed” by his “misleading and unfair allegations about his opponent, Alan King,” and that he “deserved to lose.” (And he did.)

About 15,000 more voters in the county (representing about 15% of the turnout) voted a straight Democrat ticket than voted straight Republican. And at least one county official is already making a little noise about switching from GOP to Democrat before the next election.

Marty Connors, former state GOP chair, noted the Democrats’ successes in the state’s courthouses after this election:

Connors did lament GOP losses in local seats, calling those “the real grass-roots level” that indicates the depths of a party’s true strength and public standing. “If there’s anywhere that we turned back the clock, that’s it,” he said.

Both parties produced bright spots on election night, and this was one of the brighter ones for the Democrats.

'Vote Straight Republican' Billboard in Jefferson Country

Related Articles:

December 5, 2006

Top Ten Election Winners: #8

Filed under: AL Senate, Campaign & Election, Top 10 — Danny @ 7:58 am

Some wins and losses are more notable than others. Next on our list of the Top Ten Winners:

#8. Lowell Barron

#8Lowell Barron is one tough hombre.

In 1983, Barron had represented his district for 11 months when a special election for all the legislative seats was scheduled by court order (related to re-apportionment challenges). The Democratic Party skipped the primary and named David Stout to be the nominee in Barron’s district. It’s quite a story, and when the dust cleared, Lowell Barron became the only person, before or since, elected to the legislature as a write-in candidate.

In 1999, Lt. Gov. Windom (R) “used a fast gavel and selective hearing” (B’ham News, Jan. 12, 2003) to declare the Senate had adopted rules proposed by 17 Senate allies. Barron led 18 Senate Democrats in a shutdown for days until they got the rules that put power historically assigned to the Lt. Governor into the hands of recently elected president pro tem Barron.

In 2003, six Democrats responded to Riley’s two-month campaign to create a Senate majority that included Republicans, but Barron’s 19-16 majority organized with rules that made the president pro tem, in the words of GOP Sen. Larry Dixon, “infinitely more powerful” than before (B’ham News, Jan. 15, 2003).

By 2005, eight Democrats - including his traditional allies Jim Preuitt and Larry Means - proposed a rules change to oust Barron. A majority of the Senate was said to be ready for a change, but they did not have the 21 votes necessary (out of 35) to oust the president pro tem.

Surely when the Senate organized after the 2006 election, the anti-Barron faction would likely have 18 votes needed to establish new Senate leadership.

Then 24-year Senate veteran (and dissident Democrat) Gerald Dial was upset by Kim Benefield in the Democratic primary this spring. Ms. Benefield’s campaign was actively supported by Barron and his allies. Who would have thought it possible? Barron and his allies also actively supported primary opponents against dissident Democrats Jimmy Holley (of Elba) and Jim Preuitt.

Incidentally, Dial, Preuitt, and Holley had at their disposal (scroll down to last article) the considerable skills of the Matrix Group.

In addition, Barron’s opponent this year (Don Stout, a cousin to the man Barron beat in his 1983 write-in campaign) spent ten times as much as what Barron’s 2002 GOP opponent David Hammonds spent - with virtually no change in winning margin (57%-43% in 2006, 58%-42% in 2002).

Barron is not on the list because he’s invulnerable and certainly not because he has assured his re-election as president pro tem of the Senate. He’s on the list because last spring and last fall people were ready to dance on his political grave, yet to many’s surprise he was stronger after the election than before.

Related Articles:

December 1, 2006

Top Ten Who Lost: #8

Filed under: Campaign & Election, Top 10, AL Executive Branch — Danny @ 3:59 pm

When we look back at our recent state elections, some wins and losses stand out as more notable than others. Next on our list of the Top Ten Who Lost:

#8. John Tyson, Jr.

#8John Tyson, Jr. looked to be a strong Democratic candidate for Attorney General. Good reputation, strong credentials, and a reputation for working to prevent crime before it happened, not simply prosecuting crime after it happened.

But then he looked weaker than expected in the Democratic primary against Larry Darby. Darby is an atheist and Holocaust denier who wants to “reawaken white racial awareness” and who also gathered a surprising 44% of the vote in the primary.

Apologists said that one reason was because Joe Reed and the Alabama Democratic Conference refused to endorse Tyson because of how Tyson handled the prosecution of former Mobile school board member David Thomas, Jr. (They believed Tyson was more aggressive in prosecuting charges against the popular black Board member than he was in the prosecution of charges against Jack Tillman, former sheriff of Mobile County, who is white.) Others said that since Tyson expected to win the primary against the extremist Darby, Tyson conserved his campaign funds for the general election campaign against incumbent Republican Troy King. Tyson was not especially well-known statewide, and he did little to raise his profile before the primary. Still others claimed that Darby had an advantage in the race between two little-known candidates because he came first on the ballot.

Whatever the reason, Darby’s strong showing surprised many Alabamians. No matter though. Tyson had the credentials, and now he had the party’s nomination.

Tyson ran a strong campaign, had positive commercials, and every newspaper but one who supported a candidate endorsed Tyson over the incumbent Troy King. Many (for example, here) believed Tyson would win despite being outspent by a 2 to 1 margin. On election night the Democrats did better than many expected, claiming the Chief Justice and Lt. Governor’s spot, among others. But Tyson, who some believed would be one of the strongest Democratic candidates, lost to Troy King by a 53%-47% margin.

Troy King ran a negative ad featuring a murdered woman’s daughter who claimed that Tyson as Mobile County DA was slow to prosecute the murderer. In the ad, she said that Troy King’s office took over the case and got an indictment in four days.

While Tyson had some points to be made on that case (the murderer had confessed, he was a suspected serial killer who was providing information on other cases until King’s office stepped in), King’s ad was hard-hitting. Tyson could have also lost support because of his commercial made in response that may have pushed back too hard on the daughter.

Troy King may also have connected with his criticism of Tyson for having so many convictions through plea bargains. While this criticism arguably reflected that King did not understand that plea bargains are common practice and/or it highlighted King’s prosecutorial inexperience, it may have played well with voters who expected the system to work differently. Perhaps also Tyson received less support than he hoped to get from the black community because of the flap with Joe Reed and the ADC over David Thomas, Jr.

Whatever the reason, on a night when the Democrats did better than expected, Tyson stands out as one who did worse than they hoped.

Related Articles:

Top Ten Who Lost: #9

Filed under: Campaign & Election, Top 10 — Danny @ 2:22 pm

Update (12/7/06): Formatting errors that caused some text to be omitted have been fixed.

Looking at this year’s state elections… Who were the notable losers? Next on the list of the Top Ten Who Lost:

#9. Negative Campaigning

Perhaps this is wishful thinking on my part, but I would like to think that negative campaigning took a hit this election season. (By “negative campaigning,” we mean campaign material that tells how bad your opponent is rather than how good a candidate you are.)

Consider…

  • #9In Senate District 30, Republican Joan Reynolds spent over $850,000 (including over $600,000 of her own money she loaned her campaign) in a vicious campaign against incumbent Democrat “Walking” Wendell Mitchell that had people talking - especially about a TV commercial that implied Mitchell did not support our troops. In it a man who said he was Marine claimed Mitchell “would not thank an Alabama Guard unit in Iraq” - all because he missed a vote on a resolution supporting the Alabama National Guard. After “25 mail pieces and seven negative television ads” against Mitchell, and despite that some thought he was vulnerable, Mitchell still won 62% to 38%.
  • Democrat Bobby Day hit hard against Republican Arthur Orr with some harsh accusations including that Orr was part-owner of a gas station that caused cancer in a young girl. In an important race for an open seat in Senate District 3, Orr won handily, 62%-38%.
  • Republican incumbent Betty Peters in the race for District 2 of the State Board of Education took some hard hits from Charlotte Kirkland Williams and emerged victorious, 53% - 47%.
  • In the Jefferson County Probate Judge Place 1 race, Democrat Alan King defeated incumbent Mark Gaines by 6 percentage points after people reacted strongly to Gaines’ negative campaign that was widely believed to be unfair to King. (Even The Birmingham News who endorsed Gaines said he “deserved to lose.”)
  • Statewide, Lucy Baxley’s campaign against Republican Gov. Bob Riley never caught a wind as she (or the Democratic Party) tried to hammer Riley with ads on his connections to gambling money and especially the “backdoor tax increase,” i.e. the annual property tax re-appraisals. To be fair, the Riley juggernaut looked unstoppable and probably could not have been stopped with even a perfect campaign from Baxley. He really only took criticism when he ran his own negative commercial that mostly consisted of the word “liberal” and was otherwise not-so substantial. His best ads showed him to be a capable and experienced leader. Riley won 58% to 42%.
  • Republican Luther Strange’s negative ads (can’t find them still online) against Democrat Jim Folsom, Jr. in the Lt. Governor’s race never seemed to connect with voters. This may be in part because Folsom’s own positive and folksy ads were out first and were even good enough to be called “probably the best of the year.” Folks I know connected with Folsom’s gentle jab (”never played tennis at the Mountain Brook Club”) more than the less-so (”Strange is a lobbyist”), and Folsom squeaked by 51%-49%.
  • Sue Bell Cobb and incumbent Drayton Nabers both had some negative ads in the race for Chief Justice, but the Democrat Cobb is remembered for the positive “This Little Light of Mine” ad. As in Folsom’s race, the positive ads are credited as being major contributors to victory, as she surprised many with her 52% - 48% win.

No doubt there were some successful negative commercials. The commercial where a murder victim’s daughter accuses Democratic AG-candidate John Tyson, Jr. of being slow to prosecute the killer comes to mind; incumbent Troy King won by 6 percentage points in what was expected to be a closer race. Republican Beth Chapman ran some negative ads against incumbent Democrat Nancy Worley and won the race for Secretary of State (58% - 42%), but it is hard to imagine what would have had to happen to make that race close.

By and large, voters appeared to respond less well to negative campaigning. The maxim is that “no one likes negative commercials but they work;” I suggest that in this election cycle in Alabama they worked less well.

I would be interested in hearing from others, especially regarding local races, to know if this is the perception or experience of others.

Related Articles:

Top Ten Updates

Filed under: Top 10, Housekeeping — Danny @ 10:06 am

I wanted to give a heads up to anyone interested that today I will be updating the Top Ten lists started here.

I’d do it right away but my cable internet is out after last night’s storm and I’m on dialup.

You know what they say… umm… Once you go cable… um… you… mmm… nothing… nothing else is able. Yeah. Isn’t that what they say?

Also, FWIW, there are a lot of good sites that I have not yet moved to my blogroll here from the old site. Didn’t want good folks to think that I have meant to take you off the blogroll when that is not the intent at all.

November 27, 2006

Top Ten Election Winners: #9

Filed under: Campaign & Election, Top 10 — Danny @ 5:07 pm

Lots to talk about… So let’s get on with it… Next on our list of the Top Ten Winners of the Alabama Elections

#9. The Internet

Most really useful inventions - from refrigerators to microwave ovens, from telephones to the internet - go through stages on their way to widespread use:

  1. Novel Idea,
  2. Luxury Item,
  3. Accepted Appliance, and finally,
  4. Commonplace Tool.

#9Use of the internet is becoming widespread enough that the ‘net is much closer to the mature end of that cycle than it was only a few years ago. In this election, the internet grew into a particularly useful information tool beyond what it had in recent years. Think of all the campaign and election-related information that flowed freely in a manner unthinkable only an election or two ago.

  • Candidates had their own campaign websites to extol their own virtues.
  • Campaigns sent out email alerts to supporters.
  • Television commercials were available for review anytime via YouTube and similar services.
  • Here at the Parlor you could find G’s Daily News Digest served up every morning and get fresh news from around the state with an ease and convenience unimagined a few years ago.
  • If that was not enough, you could check in with the Parlor’s campaign newsfeed for even more news stories.
  • The website from the Secretary of State allowed anyone to dig into campaign finance reports to see whose money was flowing through what PACs and to what candidates.
  • Political blogs from around the state and their readers kept up lively discussions on the issues and the campaigns.
  • Falsehoods could be spread faster, of course, but they could be challenged faster.

More information is good, and the internet facilitated that information flow unlike in any previous election season.

In years past, the outlet did not exist for people to express in a far-reaching and effective manner their outrage over campaign claims made, for example, by Mark Gaines or Sunny Smallwood. This year, I received many email messages from people expressing their dismay at these campaigns.

One reader sent me email afterward and gave me permission to excerpt it:

I made the observation yesterday that this is the first time that I have really seen the effect of the internet on political campaigns. In particular, the internet fundamentally affected the impact that the traditional mailers used to have. In the past, a mailer like those sent out by Gaines and Smallwood could be very damaging because the opponent had virtually no way to respond quickly enough to the allegations. This time, however, your blog jumped on them and helped spread the word about their falsity. In addition, King’s campaign effectively used email chains to distribute Ginger Busby’s press release as well as attached recordings of Judge King’s radio ads responding to Gaines’ claims. I bet that I have talked with twenty people that got the Gaines mailer, but also read your blog or got the emails in response within hours of reading the mailer.

And undoubtedly the impact went far beyond the actual readers of these blogs and email messages. Most readers of blogs like this are the kinds of people to whom family members, co-workers, friends and acquaintances turn to get opinions. You are interested in these things, you keep up, the people around you know it and they want your opinion.

We have not seen the limits of how the internet will be used for campaigning. Some uses will be malicious, just like some uses of other tools (like the telephone) are malicious.

Granted, this is an idiosyncratic choice for an election season winner. But I shake my head in amazement when I consider this: this campaign season, people I did not know were sending me interesting information to share with other people I did not know. Quite interesting information to share with lots of people I did not know, and it all moved very quickly. We have not seen anything like this.

Related:
Top Ten Winners of the Alabama Elections
#10. Rep. Jeremy Oden

Related Articles:

November 17, 2006

Top Ten Election Winners: #10

Filed under: AL House, Campaign & Election, Top 10 — Danny @ 2:01 pm

Every election gives us winners and losers, but some are a little more noteworthy than others. The Political Parlor presents a a start on the Top Ten Winners of the Alabama Elections.

#10. Rep. Jeremy Oden (R - Vinemont)

10Rep. Jeremy Oden, a former seminarian, youth pastor, and a GOP Legislator of the Year honoree, looked vulnerable as he finished his second term in House District 11. The word is that he is too close to the House Speaker for the tastes of the House GOP leadership.

He faced an opponent in the Republican primary, David Ozment, who was endorsed by both ALFA and the Business Council of Alabama. Many predicted that Oden would be in trouble and would be in a run-off if not defeated outright.

Challenger Ozment raised more money than Oden did (even though incumbents typically do not have trouble raising more money than their challengers) including sizable donations from the PACs of BCA and ALFA. Oden loaned his campaign $15,000 and secured $8,000 more in loans to remain competive financially. AEA’s A-VOTE PAC jumped in with a late $10,000 donation to Oden’s campaign.

ALFA endorsed thirteen legislative candidates who were not incumbents in the primary races (including run-offs), and they finished an impressive 10-3. One of the three losses was Ozment, as Oden dispatched him by a 54%-36% margin with no run-off.

His opponent for the general election, Democrat Jim Boyd, spent more money campaigning for the general election after the June primary (over $100,000) than Oden raised all year for both campaigns (almost $82,000 combined for primary and general elections). The Democrat Boyd’s largest PAC contribution came from ALFA’s PAC (i.e., ELECT).

Neither House Speaker Hammett nor interests like AEA appeared to target this potentially vulnerable Republican seat. (For example, Hammett disbursed tens of thousands of dollars at a time from his own warchest to some individual campaigns, but not to Oden’s opponent, and AEA’s A-VOTE contributed to Oden’s primary campaign.) That suggests that they hope Oden is or will be sympathetic to their interests. GOP House Minority Leader Mike Hubbard may have attempted to build a bridge with his $3000 contribution to Oden’s fall campaign.

An odd aside: In a profile on the Oden/Boyd race, the Decatur Daily reported that Oden “did not respond to THE DAILY’s repeated requests for an interview.” Why would that be?

Despite his fundraising disadvantage and his perceived vulnerability, Oden won re-election to a 3rd term by a 54%-46% margin.

November 16, 2006

Top Ten Who Lost: #10

Filed under: Campaign & Election, Top 10 — Danny @ 8:58 am

Every election has winners and losers of course, but some wins or losses are more significant than others. Without additional ado, the Political Parlor presents the first on a highly subjective list about the Alabama elections, the Top Ten Who Lost.

#10. The Birmingham News

10The Birmingham News election coverage was rounded out by a poll published on Sunday two days before the election, in much the same way that a bridegroom’s attire is rounded out by the toilet paper trailing from his shoe: no matter how nicely put together everything else is, all some people remember is the big mistake. In this case, the paper’s poll missed badly, and insiders with their own polling numbers knew it immediately.

Jim Folsom’s campaign tried to blunt potential damage by circulating a release challenging the accuracy of the numbers and even the motives of the News for publishing it. Actual results of the elections two days later indicate that Folsom’s campaign was on to something; the News missed the numbers for the Democrats in the five races by an average of 11 points.

Race
R/D
News Poll #’s (%)
R/D
Election Results (%)
R/D
Governor
Riley/Baxley
59/31 58/42
Lt. Governor
Strange/Folsom
50/39 49/51
Attorney General
King/Tyson
51/33 53/47
Sec. of State
Chapman/Worley
42/32 58/42
Chief Justice
Nabers/Cobb
43/44 48/52

The fact that others recognized and challenged the mistakes immediately minimizes the likelihood that the poll was accurate at the time and that the election results reflected later shifts.

The potential damage for such a mistake is large. Such a story risks becoming a self-fulfilling prophecy. Instead of merely reporting the news, the story can create or at least influence the news. The potential for published poll results to influence an election is exactly why France does not allow poll results to be published in the week before an election. If accurate poll results are capable of influencing election results, think of the injustice made possible by the influence of a wildly inaccurate poll.

A commenter here correctly pointed out that The Birmingham News used the same pollster in 2002, and that he missed by double digits then too. On Sunday, Nov. 3, 2002, again just two days before the election, a Birmingham News story reported poll results for only the Governor’s race:

The survey of 600 registered voters who say they are likely to participate in Tuesday’s election shows Riley leading Siegelman 47 percent to 39 percent. Eleven percent said they were undecided, and 3 percent said they would vote for Libertarian candidate John Sophocleus. The margin of error was 4 percentage points.

The final election results two days later actually had Siegelman 10 percentage points higher as he and Riley finished in a virtual tie at 49% each.

I have heard an unconfirmed rumor that as a result Birmingham News editor Tom Scarritt is now telling people that The Birmingham News is out of the polling business.

November 8, 2006

Top 12 Races of Interest - Re-visited

Filed under: Campaign & Election, Top 10 — Danny @ 10:43 pm

I wanted to look again at my pre-election list.


Political Parlor’s Top Twelve Races of Interest - Revisited
#12. Secretary of State - Nancy Worley (D) v. Beth Chapman (R). I wondered if Worley had any more surprises for us, as her poll numbers stayed so high for so long. But, no. Rasputin is dead. Chapman won resoundingly, 57%-43%.
#11. Senate District 13 - Kim Benefield (D) v. Jim Ingram (R). AP and al.com had (and still have, at this writing) Benefield leading by a scant 104 votes, or 50.17% to 49.83% with 134 of 135 precincts reporting. The Anniston Star reports that she won 52%-48%. Must have been one heckuva last precinct for Benefield.
#10. Place 3 of the Court of Civil Appeals - Jim McFerrin (D) v. Terri Willingham Thomas (R). Her family’s connections to white supremacist groups and her own forgetfulness about appearing before one did not slow her down on the way to victory. Thomas won 54%-46%
#9. Jefferson County Probate Judge, Place 1 - Mark Gaines (R) v. Alan King (D). The stories from this campaign were interesting enough that I could not help but be interested. King won 53%-47%.
#8. Jefferson County Probate Judge, Place 2 - Sherri Friday (D) v. Sunny D. Smallwood (R). I said elsewhere that I have gotten more emails about these Jefferson County Probate Judge races than any subject I have blogged about. Friday overcame Smallwood’s inventive campaigning and won 54%-45%.
#7. Senate District 35 - Gary Tanner (D) v. Ben Brooks (R). Brooks ekes out a victory for the GOP, though it does not appear to be enough to swing control of the Senate to a coalition of Republicans and conservative Democrats.
#6. Senate District 22 - Pat Lindsey (D) v. John McMillan (R). Lindsey’s win is solid, 54%-46%. (Still trying to find out more about this story.)
#5. Lt. Governor - Jim Folsom, Jr. (D) v. Luther Strange (R). Folsom wins (51%-49%) which has all kinds of ramifications for the Governor’s chair in 2010 and even before.
#4. Amendment Two - I’m a little surprised this passed by such a wide margin (59%-41%). Yes, I know every newspaper endorsed it, and there was no organized opposition to it. Still, this is Alabama where the word ‘tax’ typically gets a Pavlovian “No!”
#3. Public Service Commission, Place 2 - Perry Hooper, Jr. (R) v. Susan Parker (D). Alabama Power’s investment in Hooper’s campaign did not pay off as Parker scored an electrifying victory, 53%-47%.
#2. Chief Justice of Supreme Court - Drayton Nabers (R) v. Sue Bell Cobb (D). Sue Bell Cobb’s victory (51.5% to 48.5% with a few precincts not yet tallied) over incumbent Nabers was the biggest surprise of the night to some.
#1. Attorney General - Troy King (R) v. John Tyson, Jr. (D). Democrats had high hopes for this race, but King’s margin of victory was not close, 54%-46% (with some untallied precincts). Many incorrectly believed that Tyson represented a better chance for a Democratic Pary victory than Cobb or Folsom.

See election results at al.com or here and here.

November 7, 2006

Top 12 Races of Interest

Filed under: Campaign & Election, Top 10 — Danny @ 4:38 pm

Here is a completely arbitrary list. Your mileage may vary.



Political Parlor’s Top Twelve Races of Interest
#12. Secretary of State - Nancy Worley (D) v. Beth Chapman (R). I don’t expect Worley to win, but her poll #’s have hung in there. She did receive more votes than any other candidate in any race during the primary. She had gotten bad press before then, but since then it has just piled on.
#11. Senate District 13 - Kim Benefield (D) v. Jim Ingram (R). I expect that Benefield will win after retiring Gerald Dial, a 32-year veteran of the legislature, in the Democratic primary. The race may be close, and Ingram could possibly surprise us. As mentioned before, this is an important race to determine who will control the state Senate.
#10. Place 3 of the Court of Civil Appeals - Jim McFerrin (D) v. Terri Willingham Thomas (R). She has gotten such bad press for her family’s connections to white supremacist groups and her own evasiveness about appearing before one. Will she overcome that in the race?
#9. Jefferson County Probate Judge, Place 1 - Mark Gaines (R) v. Alan King (D). I wouldn’t normally include a county race here, but the nature of the campaign has gotten so interesting that I am interested to see who prevails. Judging from emails received, so are a lot of readers.
#8. Jefferson County Probate Judge, Place 2 - Sherri Friday (D) v. Sunny D. Smallwood (R). Ditto the above. Smallwood’s campaign has been of great interest here and among readers.
#7. Senate District 35 - Gary Tanner (D) v. Ben Brooks (R). This represents one of the Republicans’ real hopes in picking up a Senate seat and possibly affecting control of the Senate.
#6. Senate District 22 - Pat Lindsey (D) v. John McMillan (R). Republicans are very hopeful of picking up a Senate seat here. McMillan has had a lot of support among commenters on the site. This is another race that plays an important role in who controls the state Senate.
#5. Lt. Governor - Jim Folsom, Jr. (D) v. Luther Strange (R). The victor presumably has the inside track for the 2010 Governor’s race. A Strange victory would give Riley more freedom to step down early if an opportunity presented itself to him (e.g., a chance to appoint himself to the Senate if Shelby stepped down for health reasons).
#4. Amendment Two - Every newspaper endorsement that I know about was in favor of its passage, and there is no organized opposition to it. Is that enough for it to pass?
#3. Public Service Commission, Place 2 - Perry Hooper, Jr. (R) v. Susan Parker (D). Hooper had huge sums of money available for his campaign, but Parker is widely believed to be more independent of the utility companies the PSC regulates and received the endorsement of every newspaper in the state. If the Democrats were to win just one state race tonight, this may be it.
#2. Chief Justice of Supreme Court - Drayton Nabers (R) v. Sue Bell Cobb (D). This appears to be a close one.
#1. Attorney General - Troy King (R) v. John Tyson, Jr. (D). Tyson received every newspaper endorsement except one. Will it be enough? Do you get the impression that these two don’t care for each other very much?

Do you have races of interest to you that are not on this list?

August 11, 2006

Most Interesting Primary Winner

Filed under: AL House, Campaign & Election, Top 10 — Danny @ 8:14 am

Just a couple of more items to push through before we close the door on the Top 10 Most Interesting Questions to Be Answered by the Primary Elections. These are ten questions we asked before the primary election. Most were answered after the June election, and a few needed the dust to settle after the run-off before we could answer them.

Question #8 was “Who Will Be the Most Interesting Newcomer Among Primary Winners?”

The caveat here is that in the next year or two, an overlooked primary winner could emerge as a character in Montgomery that would make us re-think our answer here. But for now, let’s go with what we know.

After unseating incumbent Ray Garner in June, Mac McCutcheon (R - HD 25) will bring an unusual resume’ to Montgomery: Army veteran, police officer, minister, and FBI hostage negotiator. That represents a skill set you don’t always get to see in the House. He also scored the unusual two-fer of receiving backing from AEA and ALFA. He has no opposition on the general election ballot in November.

Earl Hilliard, Jr. (D - HD 60) defeated Connie Goldsby in the July 18 run-off. He will surely be the only state legislator to be listed in the International Movie Database (did you know he was in The Truman Show?). On top of that, he wears his dad’s famous name. He also is unopposed in November.

But Patricia Todd (D - HD 54) will claim the title of Most Interesting Newcomer Among Primary Winners if her narrow run-off victory against Gaynell Hendricks stands in the race for George Perdue’s open seat. Assuming she is elected in November (there is no Republican opposition), she would be the first openly gay state legislator in Alabama’s history. The AIDS activist and delegate to the 2004 Democratic National Convention will also become the first white person elected from this predominantly black district in over 20 years.

Hendricks’ mother-in-law, Mattie Childress, has contested the results claiming Todd received “illegal votes” and noting that Todd’s financial disclosure was filed late in violation of party rules. I hear that Hendricks is not squeaky clean about meeting those deadlines either. Unless something unexpected and substantive comes out regarding the “illegal vote” charges, Todd is expected to be certified as the winner. The hearing is scheduled for August 15.

June 6, 2006

Top Ten Summary

If you are just now checking in, don’t miss that we have completed the Top 10 Most Interesting Questions to Be Answered by the Primary Elections. A quick summary with links is below.

I have enjoyed talking to some very knowledgeable folks about these issues, and I appreciate their help and insights.

I know we will be watching the primary returns with great interest!

Click the links below to go to the original post with the discussion for that question.


Top Ten Most Interesting Questions to Be Answered by the Primary Elections
#10. Who is “one and done?” - What first term state legislators look most vulnerable in the primary election?
 #9. Will the Democratic nominee for governor win the primary without a runoff? - And why is this important?
 #8. Who will be the most noteworthy newcomer among primary winners? - Lots of interesting new faces are out there. Who among them will we welcome into office?
 #7. Is Republican AG candidate Mark Montiel a contender or a pretender? - He has generated lots of interest. Does he have the legs to go the distance?
 #6. How did the ALFA slate do? - ALFA is clearly one of the most important and powerful political forces in the state. How did their slate do?
 #5. Is Secretary of State Nancy Worley vulnerable in the Democratic primary? - She has generated a lot of controversy.
 #4. Will money trump name-recognition in the Republican Lt. Governor’s race? - Wallace or Strange? Strange or Wallace?
 #3. Is Alabama Power ‘the big winner?’ - One political insider says they could be.
 #2. Are Roy Moore and his group finished as a powerful influence in Alabama politics? - From dizzying heights two years ago to… to where?
 #1. Who will control the Senate? - What are the key races races that will determine who wields the power that comes with being Senate President Pro Tem?

We should know the answer to most of these questions tonight.

June 5, 2006

Top 10 Most Interesting Questions: #1

Filed under: AL Senate, Campaign & Election, Top 10 — Danny @ 3:32 pm

There was no argument among the political insiders, campaign veterans and lobbyists who were helping me with the Top 10 Most Interesting Questions to Be Answered by the Primary Elections about what would be number one.

#1. Who will control the Senate?

About three weeks ago, one of my best sources told me:

Eighty percent of the people who work in politics believe that Riley is re-elected. Everybody is pre-occupied with the race between Barron and Preuitt.

Of course, they are not running head to head, but Senate President Pro Tem Sen. Lowell Barron (D - District 8 - DeKalb, Jackson, Madison counties) and Rules Chair Sen. Jim Preuitt (D - District 11 - Calhoun, Coosa, Elmore, Talladega counties) have clashed over leadership for the Democratic-controlled Senate. Preuitt led a coalition of conservative Democrats and Republicans in an attempt to unseat Barron from his second term as President Pro Tem. Preuitt’s coalition needed 21 votes to oust Barron as President Pro Tem, and they could not quite swing it. However, I hear that Preuitt from his seat as Rules Chair was pretty much running the show by the end of the session.

At the beginning of the next session, only 18 votes will be needed to choose the President Pro Tem for the next quadrennium. Governor Riley and plenty of his allies would love to see a Republican President Pro Tem in the Senate. That is not going to happen, and conservative Democrat Jim Preuitt would be the next best thing.

Barron is hitting back hard, not only out of desire to keep his position, but also out of frustration after putting his presumed ally Preuitt in the powerful position of Rules Chair. Preuitt used the position as a springboard to challenge Barron’s position.

For months now, folks have anticipated the primary election to see how this would play out for the next legislative session.

Says one source:

If Preuitt wins, Riley will have a lot more influence in the legislature [than if Barron wins]. Not as much as a Democratic governor would, but a lot more than Riley would have with Barron. With Preuitt in there, the conservative lobbyists will have a lot more influence. Preuitt and Dial are the most conservative Democrats. They are more conservative than some Republicans.

Can you imagine? If Preuitt wins, then [Speaker of the House] Seth Hammett who is owned by the Business Council would be the liberal Democrat.

All indications are that Barron is raising tremendous money to support Democratic challengers for three rebellious Democratic Senators who would normally be expected to have safe seats: Preuitt, Gerald Dial, and Jimmy Holley.

One source tells me that the Matrix Group - who has been underwritten by Alabama Power for so long - is on retainer to help Preuitt oust Barron. Any senatorial candidate who pledges allegiance to Preuitt has free access to all the resources of Matrix: push polls, media buys, polling.

Does Alabama Power want Barron out, I ask?

BCA, ALFA, the utilities, the road builders, pharmaceuticals, they would all line up behind Preuitt. Alabama Power doesn’t put all its eggs in one basket. They figure as long as they stay close to [Speaker of the House Seth] Hammett, they will be okay.



There are four key Democratic primary races to watch.

District 11 (Calhoun, Coosa, Elmore, Talladega Counties):
Jim Preuitt’s race against barber and ex-Talladega Mayor Larry Barton was expected to be perfunctory. Barton served three year in prison after he was convicted for 26 counts of money laundering and one count of fraud. Barton was not believed to be a strong challenger to the powerful Chair of the Senate Rules Committee. Barton has campaigned hard with a lot of money, running negative ads about Preuitt’s car dealership selling used cars as new with a picture of Preuitt’s manson in the background. An insider tells me that Preuitt could lose his once-safe seat.

District 13 (Chambers, Cherokee, Clay, Cleburne, Lee, Randolph):
Sen. Gerald Dial’s race for his ninth term in the legislature was supposed to be an easy win for the incumbent. But, Randolph Circuit Clerk Kim Benefield’s full coffers have allowed her to buy a lot of expensive Birmingham TV time to show her ads in Lineville. Former state Democratic Party Chair Phillip Kinney now does opposition research for Matrix. Kinney told one of the senators in the Preuitt group that they could not find anything negative on Benefield and that they were going to have to make something up. That is why you get the ad that tries to connect Benefield with Barron who “used $5,000 of your money to pay a shoeshine man to shine shoes for senators.” I must admit that if that is the worst thing you can say about Benefield, you are really stretching. Especially since news reports said that it was Sen. Bobby Denton (D - Muscle Shoals) who paid $5,000 to the shoeshine man (though Barron approved the payment from money allotted to Denton).

The polling has had Benefield a few points ahead most of the race, and the power of incumbency was expected to help Dial make that up, but the last I heard that has still not happened. It’s a long district with Dial’s hometown Lineville in the middle. One source told me that the farther you get from Lineville, the better Dial polls. The closer you get to Lineville, the worse he polls. His point, I believe, was that the less well-known he was, the better he polled because of his incumbency. The more well-known he was, the better Benefield polled.

Dial was originally expected to win in a walk, but now he’s running hard. He may well lose this one.

District 31 (Coffee, Covington, Dale, Houston):
One source told me that Sen. Jimmy Holley wanted to be President Pro Tem, though my other sources all believed that Holley was firmly behind Preuitt. Attorney and challenger Joe Sawyer was not expected to give Holley much opposition as Holley sought his eighth term in the state legislature. Again, unexpectedly large amounts of money, presumably from Barron, have made that race very competitive for Sawyer who may pull off the upset. One reportedly very effective ad for Sawyer that Holley has not rebutted or blunted points out that Holley supported “loan shark” legislation favorable to payday loan lenders.

District 7 (Madison):
Financial advisor Phil Dotts is running against retired doctor and Huntsville mayoral candidate Parker Griffith for the seat Sen. Jeff Enfinger is vacating. One insider told me that this race may be one of two keys, or maybe THE key, to the Barron-Preuitt power struggle. (Dial/Benefield would be the other one. However if Holley or Preuitt lose, this one would become less crucial to Barron.)

Retiring Sen. Enfinger reportedly hates Barron after Barron stripped Enfinger of his role of the Senate’s #2 post, Democratic floor leader, after criticizing Sen. Roger Bedford (D - Russellville) for pork barrel projects in Bedford’s district. Enfinger’s money has been going to PACs that support Dotts and that support senators who oppose Barron. Dotts is reportedly the more conservative candidate of the two (some tell me that Dotts is basically a Republican) though state constitution reform is a major issue of his campaign. He would be expected to support Preuitt. Griffith is the more liberal of the two (universal health care is a major issue for him) and would presumably support Barron.

I keep hearing that Griffith has the broader support and greater name recognition because of his strong showing in the Huntsville mayoral race. While I defer to minds smarter than mine on the issue, I do wonder why Dotts reported about five times as many individual donors as Griffith in the 45-day financial disclosure reports if Griffith is the one with broader support. I also wonder why Griffith has loaned his own campaign over $350,000 if he is supposed to be the one with broad support.

FWIW, one political veteran pointed out to me that a loan like that to your own campaign can mean that someone has already arranged to donate money to the campaign but that the money source does not want to be identified with the money or the campaign before the election.

Extraordinary amounts of money are being spent on the race - almost $600,000 between the two. For a primary race. Griffith’s campaign reports $180,000 on hand, presumably for a general election.


If Preuitt and Holley win their elections (which looked more certain just a few days ago) then if either side can win both of the Dial-Benefield and Dotts-Griffith races, they will have a big advantage in choosing the Senate leadership.

One veteran insider told me that you can figure all you want on which has which votes lined up, but that you never know what deal will be made in the backroom to swing a deal.

For example, my sources all agree that Charles Bishop, Republican candidate for Senate District 5, would caucus with the Barron Democrats in a heartbeat if Bishop won his race and Barron made him, say, chair of Rules Committee. “Bishop would probably pay Barron’s bills” left from the campaigns if Barron would make him Rules chair, said one source. He might not just switch caucuses, but

Bishop might change parties for Rules. He would get to strut to the mike. He wouldn’t have to keep up with the minutiae of health care or something like that.

Preuitt has had a lot of money in his warchest. If it looked like Barron was lining up the Democratic votes he needed, would Democrat Preuitt go so far as to help a Republican beat a Barron Democrat in the fall to help Preuitt become President Pro Tem? I asked one Democrat.

I sure hope that Preuitt wouldn’t help Republicans in the fall and I don’t think he would. But it is certainly not beyond possibility and that is definitely a wait and see. Another issue is to see what a Dial or Holley would do if they’re defeated in the primary. Would they endorse the GOP candidate? Run as a write-in?

Another factor is that you have Democratic Senators “like Ted Little, Larry Means, Wendell Mitchell and others who bounce back and forth between the dissident Democrats and the Barron Democrats.”

The problem is, another insider tells me, is that you need 18 votes to set the rules and choose President Pro Tem, and everybody wants a chairmanship.

Let’s wrap this up.

One great source who early on believed that Preuitt would be President Pro Tem takes the time to tally the votes this way.

I feel this pretty well reflects the leadership struggle. I’ve indicated who I feel could flip under the right circumstances…

In my mind these numbers highlight the urgency of the primary races for both sides, especially Barron.

Just thought I’d pass it along.

Definite Barron (14 votes)
Barron
Bedford
Mitchem
Mitchell
Escott
Smitherman
McClain
Denton
Zeb Little
Poole
Penn
Ross
Sanders
Figures

Definite Preuitt (14 votes)
10 currently GOP seats (assumes GOP holds SD 5 and Bishop Caucuses with GOP/Preuitt)
Butler
Means (could flip under right circumstances)
Ted Little (could flip)
Preuitt

To be Determined (Barron/Preuitt)
Griffith/Dotts
Day/Orr
Lindsay/McMillan
Tanner/GOP Nominee
Benefield/Dial
Sawyer/Holley
Singleton

One last comment… if Barron survives this challenge to his leadership and knocks a dissident Democrat or two out of office, several sources agree that Barron’s hold on leadership, at least in the short term, will be stronger than ever.

Related posts:
Intro to Top 10 Most Interesting Questions
#10. Who is “one and done?”
 #9. Will the Democratic nominee for governor win the primary without a runoff?
 #8. Who will be the most noteworthy newcomer among primary winners?
 #7. Is Republican AG candidate Mark Montiel a contender or a pretender?
 #6. How did the ALFA slate do?
 #5. Is Secretary of State Nancy Worley vulnerable in the Democratic primary?
 #4. Will money trump name-recognition in the Republican Lt. Governor’s race?
 #3. Is Alabama Power ‘the big winner?’
 #2. Are Roy Moore and his group finished as a powerful influence in Alabama politics?

Previous Entries »

Powered by WordPress

Close
E-mail It