Montgomery Advertiser – Gambling corruption trial: Democrats call for Beason to resign; prosecutors mention Republican aide paid by McGregor
Montgomery Advertiser – Church leaders criticize Alabama’s immigration law
Montgomery Advertiser – US Supreme Court upholds Alabama man’s conviction
Montgomery Advertiser – Top Republicans try to temper Beason fallout
Montgomery Advertiser – Montgomery Family Court judge leaves sooner than expected
Montgomery Advertiser – MPS officials: Recovery programs aid failing students
Montgomery Advertiser – Fewer seek jobless benefits
Montgomery Advertiser – Advertiser Editorial: Highways get safer
Huntsville Times – Did you file an insurance claim after the April tornadoes? Share your experience
Huntsville Times – Watchdog report: Huntsville towing contract still on the roadside
Huntsville Times – Shelby voices concerns to NASA over bidding for booster system
Huntsville Times – Issues with research institute ‘jeopardizing’ SACS accreditation, Alabama A&M says
Huntsville Times – Former Huntsville City Schools CFO earns same salary despite resignation
Huntsville Times – Editorial: Lawmakers forgot about raise
Birmingham News – After four days, Rep. Scott Beason leaves Alabama bingo trial witness stand
Birmingham News – Southern Baptist Convention OKs resolution calling for path to legal status for illegal immigrants
Birmingham News – Family of slain woman says execution has served justice
Birmingham News – Judge at bingo trial rules defense questions about Sen. Scott Beason’s race remarks are relevant
Birmingham News – Jefferson County distributes layoff letters to 546 employees
Press-Register – We can’t lose Fort Gaines’ piece of the past (editorial)
Tuscaloosa News – Bentley: Partlow to close by Nov. 30
Tuscaloosa News – Chain of stores gathers books for city, county students
Tuscaloosa News – Task force tackles ideas for rebuilding and improving city
Tuscaloosa News – Miners will vote today on union contract
Tuscaloosa News – EDITORIAL: Public input is crucial for rebuilding city
Florence TimesDaily – Phil Campbells help out tornado-ravaged town
Anniston Star – On stage in Anniston: More councilman escapades
Anniston Star – They’re back on Alabama beaches
Anniston Star – Phillip Tutor: Crying wolf on weather sirens
Anniston Star – James L. Evans: The two worlds of faith
Gadsden Times – County schools to buy 42 buses
Gadsden Times – POLL: Should Sen. Beason resign?
Gadsden Times – Too confident? Study shows more college freshmen feel ‘above average’
Gadsden Times – GOP planning to bring back pro-life bills in 2012 session
Associated Press – Ala. astrophysicist receives astronomy honor
Associated Press – Ala. ethics law confuses ticket holders
New York Times – Little Consensus on the Candidates
New York Times – Lawmakers Seek Assurances on Bank Regulations
Los Angeles Times – Supreme Court rules against longer prison sentences in order to rehabilitate
Los Angeles Times – Alabama targets immigrant students




campaign slogan for the future: Aborigines for Beason!
I don’t know Scott Beason personally, so I can make no credible judgement about his character. Many of his supporters have referred to him as “the most honorable man I know” and so forth. So, being neither friend nor foe of the Honorable Mr. Beason, I feel like I can offer an unbiased opinion of his now-infamous comment.
Certain words or terms carry their own connotations, and these connotations can be perceived as positive or negative. You can look up the definition of connotation, but basically, it means that regardless of the “definition”, the word or term has been, or is often used, to connote (suggest) a meaning other than it’s EXPLICIT meaning. For example, the words “slender” and “skinny” are both adjectives that mean basically the same thing: thin, slight, or small in size. But when used to physically describe a girl (or boy), then which word carries (or connotes) a more pleasing or acceptable (positive) description? Yes… slender. The word skinny suggests (or connotes) something that is generally unattractive or unwanted. So, for all of those who would defend Beason’s use of the word based on its explicit “Webster’s” definition to describe a person native to a particular area… well, they obviously aren’t familiar with the whole concept of connotations, or what words actually SUGGEST.
Why, instead of referring to “aborigines”, didn’t Beason just call them “people” or “voters” or “constituents” or “gamblers” or even “blacks” or “African Americans”? When asked this question on the stand, I believe even Beason himself could not offer ANY reason why he would use such a term. Well, may I propose that Beason is at least smart enough not to use the term “natives” because even HE knows that word carries a racial overtone. But obviously, he wasn’t smart enough to realize that substituting ABORIGINES for NATIVES was equally unacceptable… either politically, socially, or even casually. When used to label a block of predominantly black voters in Greene County, there is no real difference between the two terms. They are equally offensive. And stupid/ignorant/crazy/careless/clueless for an otherwise “HONORABLE” man and politician to use to describe this particular demographic.
Now, whether he should resign from office or leadership position in the Senate is for some other argument. But fellow Republicans and friends and supporters of the Honorable Mr.Beason, please back off your defense of Beason in using this term because of its strict dictionary definition. I very highly doubt that Mr. Beason would EVER refer to the voters of Vestavia, Mountain Brook, Shelby County, or practically any OTHER district in our great state NOT within the confines of the Black Belt as “ABORIGINES”.
As the now-popular cliche so aptly sums it up… It IS what it IS.
And what it IS… is a derogatory term with decidedly racial overtones that any honorable and AMBITIOUS politician should have been smart enough to avoid.
Or, it simply reveals his true colors.