Having survived my first post, I probably should quit while I’m ahead. Thanks for all of your encouraging words.
It’s been a good week for women. First, Elinor Ostrom, a political scientist, won the Nobel Prize in Economics for her work in economics (go figure). OK, the Nobel Prize “ain’t” what it used to be… Then, Senator Olympia Snowe may have earned a Profile in Courage Award for being the lone Republican on the Senate Finance Committee to vote in favor of the Baucus health care reform bill. She’s been on just about every news and talk show since. I was pretty impressed with her. She’s a gifted communicator—not only do the words come easily, but she seems to actually believe what she says. Speaker Pelosi, defending the “public option,” has drawn a wiggly line in the sand saying that Olympia will not control the final outcome. Don’t bet on it. When it comes down to it, the Senate will be driving this process. Snowe indicated that she could live with a “trigger.” If competition does not result from the legislation, she’d consider going to a public option. Apparently, that was in the RX Medicare legislation in 2004. Since prescription drug plans for seniors are highly competitive, she thinks the same will happen with the so-called insurance “exchange.”
There is a difference, though. As I understand it (and please help me out if I am mistaken), the exchange will not be a national exchange. Insurance companies will have to meet individual state requirements before they can enter the exchange. Now, Blue Cross may very well offer reductions to those whose employers do not offer health care benefits, but premiums are not likely to be any cheaper than they are for those who have group policies now. My employer tells us that Blue Cross has already announced increasing rates by more than 10 percent for our group. Seems like that’s not very politic of them (big hikes in the middle of the health care debate?). I asked a friend why they would do this right now—his answer? “Because they can!”
OTHER STUFF
• Terry Sewell continues to raise more money than anyone else in the race for the 7th CD. The question is whether money will make the difference in this race.
• I just came back from Washington and asked about the status of Dr. Regina Benjamin, the President’s nominee for Surgeon General. Republicans have apparently put a hold on her nomination. Speculation is they want to keep her out of the health care debate. She is a compelling advocate—by putting her nomination in a kind of limbo status, she is likely to remain relatively quiet.
• When the Pres responded glibly to the Katrina question on why the government was not responsive to the need for a full service hospital, I thought he looked pretty lame. (He said, “I just can’t write a check; there’s this thing called the Constitution and Congress.”) The truth is he can probably write a check. Then, he goes off to a fundraiser in SF where the price of a meal is 34K per couple. Sends a terrible message.
• The Administration is bent upon taking on/down FOX News. Why would they do that? “Because they can!”
• The Langford trial cranks up today. Anybody make it to the vigil?






Legislative Dispatch
Purple Dot Connection
2010 Big List
2010 Senate Elections
2010 House Elections
Press Releases
This is a great addition to a great website.
Great blog — I look forward to the posts.
Wonder if the administration recalls the old saw about fighting with someone who buys printing press ink by the barrel. Will we hear “nattering nabobs of negativism” again?
Glad to see you blogging, Natalie.
However, I think that you missed an important story last week related to an horrible incident that happened to a woman in 2005. The story was highlighted on The Daily Show, but not any other “news” organization that I saw: http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-october-14-2009/rape-nuts
I was very ashamed of our Alabama Senators and the other republicans (all men) who voted against that worthwhile amendment. If anyone would like to see it, here were is a link to the votes: http://senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=111&session=1&vote=00308#position
By the way, there have only been 38 women ever elected to the US Senate. Just so everyone will know, all of the female Republican Senators voted with the majority on this one!
Thanks, Mark–I did see the story (twice) on THE DAILY SHOW. I would say the Jeff Sessions did not do us proud. I also just saw something on politicalwire.com (which is a great site for daily briefings) that suggested that polling in Maine found Olympia Snowe with higher favorabilities among DEMS than REPS. For those who haven’t seen it, go to THE DAILY SHOW’s website and find last night’s show or try this link: http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/wed-october-14-2009/rape-nuts
Great post. Another thing to add to this discussion is the release of the Shriver Report, which among other things details that by the end of the year women will make up 50% of the workforce for the first time ever in America.
I’m not really sure what the Administration’s options vis a vis Fox News really are. A few weeks after the inauguration, Fox effectively declared war on Obama. Promoting anti-Obama “Tea Parties,” singling out and attacking administration appointees, reporting Republican talking point releases verbatim as real news. They deny it, but this kind of partisanship has in no way been confined to their opinion shows…their news shows, in most cases (excluding Shepard Smith) do the same things. What are the options when a “news” outlet decides to destroy an administration? Is it really an effective strategy to ignore it? All the White House is doing is pointing out what should be an obvious fact…Fox News is an arm of the RNC.