<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: King&#8217;s Ransom</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/</link>
	<description>&#38; Home of Lawn Mower Repair</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:32:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aubie</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-29708</link>
		<dc:creator>Aubie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 14:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/#comment-29708</guid>
		<description>Returning to the topic of King&#039;s salary, it&#039;s interesting to note that his salary structure seems to violate the state Constitution.  The Justices - to whom King&#039;s salary is linked - receive a pay raise each year.  The Constitution, however, states that Constitutional Officers (of which King is one) shall not have their salary increased or diminished while in office.  So, for example, during Governor Riley&#039;s first term of office, the Legislature enacted several state employee pay raises.  Instead of receiving those raises when the other state employees received them, Governor Riley&#039;s salary got the cumulative effect of all of those raises at the start of his second term.  King, however, is the only Constitutional Officer that receives a salary increase during a term.  Just something to think about.  From what I understand, it&#039;s been like this since Pryor was in office as AG.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Returning to the topic of King&#8217;s salary, it&#8217;s interesting to note that his salary structure seems to violate the state Constitution.  The Justices &#8211; to whom King&#8217;s salary is linked &#8211; receive a pay raise each year.  The Constitution, however, states that Constitutional Officers (of which King is one) shall not have their salary increased or diminished while in office.  So, for example, during Governor Riley&#8217;s first term of office, the Legislature enacted several state employee pay raises.  Instead of receiving those raises when the other state employees received them, Governor Riley&#8217;s salary got the cumulative effect of all of those raises at the start of his second term.  King, however, is the only Constitutional Officer that receives a salary increase during a term.  Just something to think about.  From what I understand, it&#8217;s been like this since Pryor was in office as AG.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-29678</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 04:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/#comment-29678</guid>
		<description>Dems and the gay lobby having a field day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dems and the gay lobby having a field day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-29646</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:36:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/#comment-29646</guid>
		<description>Also worth a look:

myspace.com/troykingalabamaqueen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also worth a look:</p>
<p>myspace.com/troykingalabamaqueen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-29645</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 01:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/#comment-29645</guid>
		<description>King can buy a lot of pretty little boys for that money</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>King can buy a lot of pretty little boys for that money</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loretta Nall</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-29642</link>
		<dc:creator>Loretta Nall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/#comment-29642</guid>
		<description>yawn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yawn</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-29640</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/#comment-29640</guid>
		<description>I may call DHR.  I did not realize the boy was a minor.  That raises questions regarding some of the pictures of him you have been posting on your blog.  Very troubling questions.  I still have not heard you deny the widespread rumors.  The seriousness of the charge leads me to think that your continuing refusal to deny the rumors is because they are true.  The clock is ticking Loretta.  Tick tock tick tock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may call DHR.  I did not realize the boy was a minor.  That raises questions regarding some of the pictures of him you have been posting on your blog.  Very troubling questions.  I still have not heard you deny the widespread rumors.  The seriousness of the charge leads me to think that your continuing refusal to deny the rumors is because they are true.  The clock is ticking Loretta.  Tick tock tick tock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loretta Nall</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-29635</link>
		<dc:creator>Loretta Nall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:20:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/#comment-29635</guid>
		<description>Hey you can request an investigation....just don&#039;t send Troy King...cuz I won&#039;t allow him to get anywhere near my 15-year-old son</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey you can request an investigation&#8230;.just don&#8217;t send Troy King&#8230;cuz I won&#8217;t allow him to get anywhere near my 15-year-old son</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-29633</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/#comment-29633</guid>
		<description>Loretta appears to be continuing to try to distract both her voters from the sex scandal involving her son and an abnormally large zuchini.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loretta appears to be continuing to try to distract both her voters from the sex scandal involving her son and an abnormally large zuchini.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Loretta Nall</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-29618</link>
		<dc:creator>Loretta Nall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/#comment-29618</guid>
		<description>He needs that money to keep all his  messieurs happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He needs that money to keep all his  messieurs happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/comment-page-1/#comment-29616</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 21:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/07/15/kings-ransom/#comment-29616</guid>
		<description>Which is exactly why he won&#039;t resign. He needs the money. How many mortages does he have on his house now? Two or three?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which is exactly why he won&#8217;t resign. He needs the money. How many mortages does he have on his house now? Two or three?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
