<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: AL-02 Poll #&#8217;s</title>
	<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/</link>
	<description>&#038; Home of Lawn Mower Repair</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 11:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: William Wyatt Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24210</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 15:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24210</guid>
					<description>I am gonna say Schmidtke will not be in the double digits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am gonna say Schmidtke will not be in the double digits.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JT</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24204</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 14:25:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24204</guid>
					<description>No way schmidtke makes a run off, publius.  any two of:  love, woods, smith will be in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No way schmidtke makes a run off, publius.  any two of:  love, woods, smith will be in it.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24184</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24184</guid>
					<description>Schmidtke will NOT be in any runoff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Schmidtke will NOT be in any runoff.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24180</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 05:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24180</guid>
					<description>Publius, if TV is what counts, I would expect Woods over Schmidtke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Publius, if TV is what counts, I would expect Woods over Schmidtke.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Publius</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24176</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 02:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24176</guid>
					<description>it is all about TV. Schmidtke v Smith in the runoff, unless jere beasley's 'christian coaltion shill Brinson' funnels enough money and lies on behalf of jay love. When christians give Christians a bad name it is not unlike the force of beauty translating honesty from what it is, into a bawd, rather than the power of honesty's ability to translate beauty to permanent status. (Shakespeare, apologies for the malaprop of your excellent advice vis, hamlet to ophelia, but it is no better said!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is all about TV. Schmidtke v Smith in the runoff, unless jere beasley&#8217;s &#8216;christian coaltion shill Brinson&#8217; funnels enough money and lies on behalf of jay love. When christians give Christians a bad name it is not unlike the force of beauty translating honesty from what it is, into a bawd, rather than the power of honesty&#8217;s ability to translate beauty to permanent status. (Shakespeare, apologies for the malaprop of your excellent advice vis, hamlet to ophelia, but it is no better said!)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24156</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 22:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24156</guid>
					<description>woods vs smith may very well happen.  he might have an edge since he has strong ties to both dothan and montgomery.  he was born and raised in dothan and has lived in montgomery and been part of the business community there for over twenty years.  he may have a better shot than love.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>woods vs smith may very well happen.  he might have an edge since he has strong ties to both dothan and montgomery.  he was born and raised in dothan and has lived in montgomery and been part of the business community there for over twenty years.  he may have a better shot than love.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24147</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 21:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24147</guid>
					<description>I don't think you can rule out Smith in the runoff.  I think the Wiregrass wants this seat worse than Montgomery and will turn out better in the extra election.  So I think Smith will be strong in the runoff, although Woods could be too with his ties to the Wiregrass.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you can rule out Smith in the runoff.  I think the Wiregrass wants this seat worse than Montgomery and will turn out better in the extra election.  So I think Smith will be strong in the runoff, although Woods could be too with his ties to the Wiregrass.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24144</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24144</guid>
					<description>Post 31, maybe you should re read Post 30.  It agrees that Smith will make a run off but will likely lose at that point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post 31, maybe you should re read Post 30.  It agrees that Smith will make a run off but will likely lose at that point.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24143</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 19:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24143</guid>
					<description>No.  Smith has had a very bad month, but still leads.  That shows there is a core support that will not go away and I would guess that is coming from the Wiregrass.  Far more important in these numbers are the stagnancy (after a month and a half media blitz) in the numbers of Love and the surge upward (with almost the same media buy) of Woods.  

An impartial observer has to concede that Smith is the most likely of the major candidates to make the runoff, and I would make Woods the favorite for the other spot (and possibly the favorite to lead the primary).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.  Smith has had a very bad month, but still leads.  That shows there is a core support that will not go away and I would guess that is coming from the Wiregrass.  Far more important in these numbers are the stagnancy (after a month and a half media blitz) in the numbers of Love and the surge upward (with almost the same media buy) of Woods.  </p>
<p>An impartial observer has to concede that Smith is the most likely of the major candidates to make the runoff, and I would make Woods the favorite for the other spot (and possibly the favorite to lead the primary).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Yepper</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24136</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/05/al-02-poll-s/#comment-24136</guid>
					<description>Tobie is basically correct, but I do think HAS will make it to a run off.  But she will not go any further.  Once it is down to two the others will not split votes and she will lose.  That is best as HAS would be a weak candidate against Mayor Bright as others have suggested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tobie is basically correct, but I do think HAS will make it to a run off.  But she will not go any further.  Once it is down to two the others will not split votes and she will lose.  That is best as HAS would be a weak candidate against Mayor Bright as others have suggested.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.394 seconds -->
