<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill to Overturn SBOE Ban Unlikely to Pass This Year</title>
	<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/</link>
	<description>&#038; Home of Lawn Mower Repair</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:28:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23911</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 12:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23911</guid>
					<description>Brom Bones:  ALISON does not yet reflect that the bill has been officially transmitted to (or received by) the Senate.  Assuming that's correct, the bill will be received and get it's first readin on Tuesday, teh 28th day.  The committee to which it is assigned could meet that day, but would not be able to report the bill back to the Senate until the 29th day, and then could not be considered by the body until the 30th day.  So, technically, the bill has the necssary time to move.  Danny's point, however, is that passage on the 30th day would allow the Governor to veto the bill and the legislature wouldn't have the opportunity to override the veto.  The reason we see the break between the 29th legislative day and the 30th legislative day is to allow sufficient time for the Governor to veto legislation and give the legislature an opportunity to override.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brom Bones:  ALISON does not yet reflect that the bill has been officially transmitted to (or received by) the Senate.  Assuming that&#8217;s correct, the bill will be received and get it&#8217;s first readin on Tuesday, teh 28th day.  The committee to which it is assigned could meet that day, but would not be able to report the bill back to the Senate until the 29th day, and then could not be considered by the body until the 30th day.  So, technically, the bill has the necssary time to move.  Danny&#8217;s point, however, is that passage on the 30th day would allow the Governor to veto the bill and the legislature wouldn&#8217;t have the opportunity to override the veto.  The reason we see the break between the 29th legislative day and the 30th legislative day is to allow sufficient time for the Governor to veto legislation and give the legislature an opportunity to override.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: HotCrotch</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23888</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 01:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23888</guid>
					<description>The FEDS will lift the skirt of every vote to promote double dipping.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The FEDS will lift the skirt of every vote to promote double dipping.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: JD</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23886</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23886</guid>
					<description>McClendon had the AEA virus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>McClendon had the AEA virus
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23885</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:30:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23885</guid>
					<description>Jim McClendon was home sick with a virus and wasn't in Montgomery on Thursday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jim McClendon was home sick with a virus and wasn&#8217;t in Montgomery on Thursday.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23884</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 23:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23884</guid>
					<description>Looks like Mike Hubbard is losing his grip on things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like Mike Hubbard is losing his grip on things.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23879</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 21:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23879</guid>
					<description>I couldn't help but notice Republicans Spencer Collier, Blaine Galliher, Todd Greeson, Jeremy Oden, Allen Treadaway all voted for the bill.

The following Republicans DID NOT VOTE at all on the bill or took a walk: Roberty Bentley, David Grimes, Mike Hill, Jim McClendon, Mac McCutcheon, Elwyn Thomas.

11 Republicans in all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t help but notice Republicans Spencer Collier, Blaine Galliher, Todd Greeson, Jeremy Oden, Allen Treadaway all voted for the bill.</p>
<p>The following Republicans DID NOT VOTE at all on the bill or took a walk: Roberty Bentley, David Grimes, Mike Hill, Jim McClendon, Mac McCutcheon, Elwyn Thomas.</p>
<p>11 Republicans in all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dan t</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23870</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23870</guid>
					<description>i dont understand the democrats who are pushing this bill. from a political standpoint this bill is a no win for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont understand the democrats who are pushing this bill. from a political standpoint this bill is a no win for them.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Brom Bones</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23860</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 20:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/05/02/bill-to-overturn-sboe-ban-unlikely-to-pass-this-year/#comment-23860</guid>
					<description>Why is the bill dead in the water already going into day 28?  Can't a bill be assigned to a committee and voted out of that committee on the same day?  Or am I thinking about conference committees?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the bill dead in the water already going into day 28?  Can&#8217;t a bill be assigned to a committee and voted out of that committee on the same day?  Or am I thinking about conference committees?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
