<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scrushy Deemed a Flight Risk</title>
	<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/03/27/scrushy-deemed-a-flight-risk/</link>
	<description>&#038; Home of Lawn Mower Repair</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 20:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/03/27/scrushy-deemed-a-flight-risk/#comment-21287</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/03/27/scrushy-deemed-a-flight-risk/#comment-21287</guid>
					<description>"If Scrushy is willing to put up all of his assets as colaterral (i hate double letters, way too hard to spell), how is he a flight risk?"

That's easy. He's pledging the assets the government KNOWS about. Scrushy is a very smart man so I'm sure he has heard of Asset Protection before. Not to mention the amount of money he's funneled to his cronies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If Scrushy is willing to put up all of his assets as colaterral (i hate double letters, way too hard to spell), how is he a flight risk?&#8221;</p>
<p>That&#8217;s easy. He&#8217;s pledging the assets the government KNOWS about. Scrushy is a very smart man so I&#8217;m sure he has heard of Asset Protection before. Not to mention the amount of money he&#8217;s funneled to his cronies.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: walt moffett</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/03/27/scrushy-deemed-a-flight-risk/#comment-21252</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 15:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/03/27/scrushy-deemed-a-flight-risk/#comment-21252</guid>
					<description>Hubris smiles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hubris smiles.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dan t</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/03/27/scrushy-deemed-a-flight-risk/#comment-21247</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 14:25:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/03/27/scrushy-deemed-a-flight-risk/#comment-21247</guid>
					<description>Well at least some justice was done yesterday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well at least some justice was done yesterday.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: William Wyatt Wallace</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/03/27/scrushy-deemed-a-flight-risk/#comment-21231</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 04:18:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/03/27/scrushy-deemed-a-flight-risk/#comment-21231</guid>
					<description>If Scrushy is willing to put up all of his assets as colaterral (i hate double letters, way too hard to spell), how is he a flight risk?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Scrushy is willing to put up all of his assets as colaterral (i hate double letters, way too hard to spell), how is he a flight risk?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Birmingham Blues &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Siegelman To Be Released on Bond</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/03/27/scrushy-deemed-a-flight-risk/#comment-21228</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 03:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/03/27/scrushy-deemed-a-flight-risk/#comment-21228</guid>
					<description>[...] The court denied Richard Scrushy&#8217;s request for release. His attorney had no details, but I&#8217;d guess he&#8217;s considered a flight risk. He certainly has the financial wherewithal to take off for parts unknown, and his unscheduled yacht cruise last year didn&#8217;t win him any points with the Feds.  [UPDATE:  Danny confirms my guess here.] I&#8217;m glad Siegelman is being released. He&#8217;s no danger to society, and I can&#8217;t see him running. It&#8217;s a waste of taxpayers&#8217; money to keep him in prison while his conviction is appealed. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The court denied Richard Scrushy&#8217;s request for release. His attorney had no details, but I&#8217;d guess he&#8217;s considered a flight risk. He certainly has the financial wherewithal to take off for parts unknown, and his unscheduled yacht cruise last year didn&#8217;t win him any points with the Feds.  [UPDATE:  Danny confirms my guess here.] I&#8217;m glad Siegelman is being released. He&#8217;s no danger to society, and I can&#8217;t see him running. It&#8217;s a waste of taxpayers&#8217; money to keep him in prison while his conviction is appealed. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.408 seconds -->
