<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CBS News: Siegelman Piece On for Sunday</title>
	<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/</link>
	<description>&#038; Home of Lawn Mower Repair</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 00:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18789</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 04:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18789</guid>
					<description>just a little insight from loserville, email thread from glynn "the birdwatcher" wilson...hell, he banned me!

On 2/23/08 8:23 PM, "Glynn Wilson"
Jack off into your Jim Beam, Bush boy...
- Hide quoted text -



On 2/23/08 8:21 PM, "AL STATE NEWS"  wrote:


- Hide quoted text -
golly, gee. what will i do.

On 2/24/08, Glynn Wilson  wrote: 

Now you are banned. Plenty of precedent for that. Ever read Jay Rosen at NYU's Press Think? I thought not... 



On 2/23/08 8:11 PM, "AL STATE NEWS"  wrote:


I have enough degrees to figure out how insecure you are, that is a fact.  If you would just try, a little, to not come off as abrasive and defensive, you might have a chance to gain respect.  right now, you have zero.  there is no one in the blog world that respects you, and there is no way you can prove otherwise - that is a fact and you know it (even if you won't admit it).  you have an opportunity to gain some, but it would take putting your ego and lack of recognition aside.  not sure that you can do that, but everyone comes to a point when they realize that they are only great in their own minds.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just a little insight from loserville, email thread from glynn &#8220;the birdwatcher&#8221; wilson&#8230;hell, he banned me!</p>
<p>On 2/23/08 8:23 PM, &#8220;Glynn Wilson&#8221;<br />
Jack off into your Jim Beam, Bush boy&#8230;<br />
- Hide quoted text -</p>
<p>On 2/23/08 8:21 PM, &#8220;AL STATE NEWS&#8221;  wrote:</p>
<p>- Hide quoted text -<br />
golly, gee. what will i do.</p>
<p>On 2/24/08, Glynn Wilson  wrote: </p>
<p>Now you are banned. Plenty of precedent for that. Ever read Jay Rosen at NYU&#8217;s Press Think? I thought not&#8230; </p>
<p>On 2/23/08 8:11 PM, &#8220;AL STATE NEWS&#8221;  wrote:</p>
<p>I have enough degrees to figure out how insecure you are, that is a fact.  If you would just try, a little, to not come off as abrasive and defensive, you might have a chance to gain respect.  right now, you have zero.  there is no one in the blog world that respects you, and there is no way you can prove otherwise - that is a fact and you know it (even if you won&#8217;t admit it).  you have an opportunity to gain some, but it would take putting your ego and lack of recognition aside.  not sure that you can do that, but everyone comes to a point when they realize that they are only great in their own minds.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18771</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 23:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18771</guid>
					<description>http://www.al.com/news/independent/index.ssf?/base/news/1203797709157730.xml&#38;coll=4

little different story than you'll hear from the lib media</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.al.com/news/independent/index.ssf?/base/news/1203797709157730.xml&amp;coll=4" rel="nofollow">http://www.al.com/news/independent/index.ssf?/base/news/1203797709157730.xml&amp;coll=4</a></p>
<p>little different story than you&#8217;ll hear from the lib media
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18755</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18755</guid>
					<description>&lt;i&gt;A comment was deleted because the writer represented himself as being someone that he clearly is not.&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>A comment was deleted because the writer represented himself as being someone that he clearly is not.</i>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Voice of Reason</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18739</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18739</guid>
					<description>Oh, I see.  Now Sessions is in on it.  I look forward to seeing how McCain and Huckabee get tied.  And maybe Britnery Spears and Raul Castro, too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I see.  Now Sessions is in on it.  I look forward to seeing how McCain and Huckabee get tied.  And maybe Britnery Spears and Raul Castro, too!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Newhouse Hater</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18736</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 15:20:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18736</guid>
					<description>A nice spin job by the Newhouse boys and their friends. Probably tough for Eddie Curran to see things clearly when he's been stuck in Sessions' hip pocket for so many years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A nice spin job by the Newhouse boys and their friends. Probably tough for Eddie Curran to see things clearly when he&#8217;s been stuck in Sessions&#8217; hip pocket for so many years.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Voice of Reason</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18730</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18730</guid>
					<description>Check out the American Spectator's take on the 60 Minutes story.  "The False and the Absurd":  http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=12789</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the American Spectator&#8217;s take on the 60 Minutes story.  &#8220;The False and the Absurd&#8221;:  <a href="http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=12789" rel="nofollow">http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=12789</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: TV Guide</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18729</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18729</guid>
					<description>The Oscars start after 60 Minutes is over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Oscars start after 60 Minutes is over.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Buried</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18709</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 05:12:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18709</guid>
					<description>They are burying the 60 Minutes story and running it opposite The Oscars.  So it will be Horton (Bill and Scott), Glyn loco Wilson + benefactors Milton and Stan Pate.  Nice group, but probably all that will be watching.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are burying the 60 Minutes story and running it opposite The Oscars.  So it will be Horton (Bill and Scott), Glyn loco Wilson + benefactors Milton and Stan Pate.  Nice group, but probably all that will be watching.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Do what?</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18690</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:25:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18690</guid>
					<description>Comment from #39 reads: There seems to be a concerted effort to make a big point of Simpson not mentioning the Rove request for sexually compromising pictures if Siegelman in the congressional testimony. I think it would have appeared rather unseemly and disrespectful of Congress to have done so. 

Oh, really.  Didn't Congress conduct hearings into Monica Lewinsky's oral maneuvers with Billy Clinton and ask very detailed questions about it?  Didn't Howell Heflin ask Fawn Hall about taking government documents out of a government building in her "panties and brassiere" during Iran Contra?  It seems to me that Congress doesn't find anything too unseemly and disrespectful to ask about.

Gimme a break you freakin' Siegelman/Simpson apologist!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comment from #39 reads: There seems to be a concerted effort to make a big point of Simpson not mentioning the Rove request for sexually compromising pictures if Siegelman in the congressional testimony. I think it would have appeared rather unseemly and disrespectful of Congress to have done so. </p>
<p>Oh, really.  Didn&#8217;t Congress conduct hearings into Monica Lewinsky&#8217;s oral maneuvers with Billy Clinton and ask very detailed questions about it?  Didn&#8217;t Howell Heflin ask Fawn Hall about taking government documents out of a government building in her &#8220;panties and brassiere&#8221; during Iran Contra?  It seems to me that Congress doesn&#8217;t find anything too unseemly and disrespectful to ask about.</p>
<p>Gimme a break you freakin&#8217; Siegelman/Simpson apologist!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: GlynGetsItWrong</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18687</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 21:11:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/02/21/cbs-news-siegelman-piece-on-for-sunday/#comment-18687</guid>
					<description>He says something on his little blog about a follow up in "The Nation" - I assume The Nation Magazine.  Last time he made a bunch of hype and the Nation did put a column of his on the WEBSITE.  Anyway, he got a major fact wrong and it had to be corrected and was a mess.  Ole Glyn claims to be a journalist, but when he gets one bite at the apple, he fails miserably.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He says something on his little blog about a follow up in &#8220;The Nation&#8221; - I assume The Nation Magazine.  Last time he made a bunch of hype and the Nation did put a column of his on the WEBSITE.  Anyway, he got a major fact wrong and it had to be corrected and was a mess.  Ole Glyn claims to be a journalist, but when he gets one bite at the apple, he fails miserably.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
