|
||||
Siegelman Piece Not on 60 Minutes Tonight – Updated Posted by Danny, on February 17th, 2008, at 10:16 amUpdate: We got the definitive word; the Siegelman story is not airing on 60 Minutes tonight despite the original post below to the contrary. Even the show’s producer who did the piece doesn’t know when it will air – and will not until the Thursday before the broadcast.
Hat Tip to The World Around You. Related Articles: 71 comments to Siegelman Piece Not on 60 Minutes Tonight – Updated |
ChangeI wish my friend Hinton Mitchem godspeed and good luck after his retirement from public service. Hinton, on Monday, announced what many had suspected — he will not seek re-election. I remember meeting Hinton for the first time while I was a student at Auburn University. He served the people of his [...] Ten Minutes in the House, Senate Moves On Here is a quick preview of the upcoming week in Montgomery. This week will be a standard legislative schedule for the House. We will be in session on Tuesday and Thursday with committee meetings scheduled for Wednesday. Back in the Day... Union Avenue in Ozark in the 1920s |
The Alabama Line is being updated and will return perhaps as soon as the first week of February. The Alabama Line and its contents are the creation of Doc’s Political Parlor, reflect consensus from insiders and well-connected folks on both sides of the aisle, and will be updated as conditions change. These odds are meant to inform, entertain, and provoke, not to serve as actual means for losing money. Permission granted to use this material if PoliticalParlor.net is cited as the source. |
||
|
Copyright © 2010 Doc's Political Parlor - All Rights Reserved |
||||
Legislative Dispatch
Purple Dot Connection
2010 Big List
2010 Senate Elections
2010 House Elections
Press Releases
Don’t blame the Univ. of Alabama. They just provide the education and open up the mind. Every so ofter one of the students leaves with the wrong end of their body opened, as in the LF case
JD, I wasn’t blaming the U of A. That was sarcasm. He used that as part of the reason he is more enlightened than the rest of us. Does he really think everybody else are uneducated rednecks who have never traveled outside of Alabama or visited an art museum?
Everyone should simply treat the Locust Fork site like Playboy: just look at the pretty pictures, but don’t waste your time reading the articles.
I hear that Locust Fork boy is working on a new media project with Bob Martin of the Montgomery Independent. Having those two left-wing lunatics team up on their conspiracy coverage gives me quite the chuckle. Can’t wait to see what kind of fiction they come up with next.
I think I’ll grab my Red Ryder BB gun and go shoot some birds in the backyard in honor of the Bogus Dork Journal.
Glyn Wilson is a single guy who drives a MINI VAN. What else need be said.
Kryptonite, why the attempt to tie Bob Martin to the nut job at LocustFork?
More aptly stated, as in typical Rovian fashion, the Bill Johnson’s of the world and Riley fascists attempt to demean, slander, discredit, intimidate, or silence anyone they cannot control.
Take Bob Martin. He publishes stories that are unfavorable to the Riley agenda. He is now demonized as an obvious tool of the Dems or worse yet, a friend of the Locustfork nutjob.
Martin and the Locustfork nut are apples and oranges. Get serious.
Wait watch and See Danny You should make sure all your posters know everything on this site needs to be true and correct because soon you may all find yourself before a jury explaining why you were libeling and slandering people. Ya’ll all know what you are doing and this site can be subpeonaed into court and don’t think it won’t because it can and there are folks watching willing and able. This game of slander and libel is about to be over. Plus did ya’ll know criminal slander and libel is a crime so I hope what you have said is true and you can prove it. wait watch and see
Maybe so, Glynn, but I still put comments on your site that you deleted, even if you don’t want to admit it. Goodness, you have a thin skin.
That wasn’t me, GOP Girl. Do you see how anonymity causes confusion and doesn’t work?
In the interest of continuing to try and educate you Alabama dumbasses, here’s an example of a civil discussion in a blog post from two people who have a fundamental difference in the role of government in the economy. Check out the comments at the end of this post.
http://tinyurl.com/34wqec
And I freely admit to deleting comments like the one’s you people post here. I don’t allow it and won’t.
But I’ve never seen the name Lou. It must be Susan, Margaret and GOP Girl, since it is clear from your writing style that you are one and the same. You must just get them all mixed up.
You may be fooling some of the people some of the time, but not this former professor who can recognize writing styles.
As for Danny, if something doesn’t change about this site very soon in terms of moderating the libel and defamation, I am about to reveal your identify on my site and make copies for your congregation. Unless your goal is to be defrocked and become infamous and stuck being a bad political blogger for the rest of your life, perhaps you will take these comments to heart.
The people who post here do not know what they are talking about. If it takes a hard lesson for them to learn it, then I’ll be glad to deliver it…
I am only Margaret, not Susan, GOP Girl or even Lou. Sorry, but your skills of recognizing writing styles have missed their mark this time.
Can you set up a separate thread for blog wars, jedi knights and general discussion about the star wars trilogy and one for civilized political discussion.
This thread has to be approaching the top ten category.
Glynn,
My name is Susan Fillippeli and I will stand up to you anytime, anywhere, in any court of law and defend Danny’s right to maintain a free an open forum and my freedom to critcize and disagree with anyone I choose.
Susan Fillippeli
Auburn, Alabama
“I am about to reveal your identify on my site and make copies for your congregation”
Superman, you won’t do it. I double dare you.
The “REAL” Superman might have a good case of slander & libel against an imposter using his name, certainly not in the cause of “Truth, Justice and the American Way”
I’m going bird hunting.
You people are about the dumbest bunch of crackers I’ve seen since the early days of AOL chat rooms. It is obvious to any objective observer that you are GOP operatives trying the same old game of shouting down the ONLY person in this room who came to you to try to give you a simple fact: The 60 Minutes story did not run Sunday, as was reported here and by the APT reporter.
As for Truth, Justice and the American Way, Jill Simpson is the true believer in your state. You can’t handle the truth, and you go along as your political heroes destroy the rule of law by putting the opposition in jail. There is nothing American about that.
I would be interested to read an explanation of the discrepancies in the accounts given by Simpson. First she said Don conceded because of a Klan rally. Don stated that wasn’t true. Then in her statement in Washington, she said there was a deal in which Don was told his legal problems would go away if he conceded. As far as I know, Don never brought this up. Also, she changed her story about Karl Rove. It went from being her understanding that someone might have contacted a person named Karl who might have been Rove to Rove had been contacted and had been instrumental in Seigalman’s indictment.
Also, I would love to know who you think are GOP operatives on here and why Wilson has a monopoly on the truth?
I see that when Glynn’s bluff is called, he disappears. I thought as much.
Y’all might want to check this link now and get your Tivo set.
http://blog.locustfork.net/
Oh wow, Glyn Wilson, Scott Horton and Bill Horton will have something to do on Sunday night. Maybe Milton McGregot and Stan Pate will have them over to Milton’s place and they can watch it on a big screen.
Bill, where will you and the Rileyites gather to watch it? The Canary home? If Patsy is there I bet you won’t be drinking.
Cheers.