<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Important Legislative Special Election in the History of Alabama</title>
	<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/</link>
	<description>&#038; Home of Lawn Mower Repair</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17143</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:59:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17143</guid>
					<description>I should have added that no one HAS to respect anyone else's beliefs. If a person thinks capital punishment is murder, then he doesn't have to pretend that the opposite view could be correct.  Do you respect a Jihadist's view that non-believers should be murdered? The same goes for a person who thinks abortion is murder. How can you expect a person who thinks an act is murder to say, "but I respect your view that murdering unborn, innocent, and helpless children is just fine." Again, I don't know what the answer is, but I think this issue is a lot more nuanced than you present it as an issue only of control over one's reproductive system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have added that no one HAS to respect anyone else&#8217;s beliefs. If a person thinks capital punishment is murder, then he doesn&#8217;t have to pretend that the opposite view could be correct.  Do you respect a Jihadist&#8217;s view that non-believers should be murdered? The same goes for a person who thinks abortion is murder. How can you expect a person who thinks an act is murder to say, &#8220;but I respect your view that murdering unborn, innocent, and helpless children is just fine.&#8221; Again, I don&#8217;t know what the answer is, but I think this issue is a lot more nuanced than you present it as an issue only of control over one&#8217;s reproductive system.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17141</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17141</guid>
					<description>I have stated above that I am not certain what the law should be when I said that I don't necessarily know what the role of government should be.  So I don't think I am forcing anyone to do anything. However, the fact that a child is alive before 40 weeks gestation is not really under dispute.  Have you ever seen a pre-natal ultra-sound? These babies move their arms and legs around, they take in nutrition, they excrete waste, they have times of being awake and being asleep, etc. The question is not whether they are alive. The question is whether the rights of privacy of the mother super-cede the rights of a child because he is still in her womb. BTW, the government forces all sorts of stuff on us and there are groups trying to force all sorts of new stuff on us.  I think it is interesting that this issue gets such special wording as "choice." Aren't all the issues really about choice? The choice to bear arms, the choice to use drugs, the choice to have an abortion, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have stated above that I am not certain what the law should be when I said that I don&#8217;t necessarily know what the role of government should be.  So I don&#8217;t think I am forcing anyone to do anything. However, the fact that a child is alive before 40 weeks gestation is not really under dispute.  Have you ever seen a pre-natal ultra-sound? These babies move their arms and legs around, they take in nutrition, they excrete waste, they have times of being awake and being asleep, etc. The question is not whether they are alive. The question is whether the rights of privacy of the mother super-cede the rights of a child because he is still in her womb. BTW, the government forces all sorts of stuff on us and there are groups trying to force all sorts of new stuff on us.  I think it is interesting that this issue gets such special wording as &#8220;choice.&#8221; Aren&#8217;t all the issues really about choice? The choice to bear arms, the choice to use drugs, the choice to have an abortion, etc.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17096</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17096</guid>
					<description>Margaret I respect your right to believe that a child in the womb is alive, you must also respect the right of women to have a different belief.  You can't force your beliefs on others anymore than they can force their beliefs on you. Every woman should have the right to make her own choices.  That is the difference between being pro choice and pro abortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Margaret I respect your right to believe that a child in the womb is alive, you must also respect the right of women to have a different belief.  You can&#8217;t force your beliefs on others anymore than they can force their beliefs on you. Every woman should have the right to make her own choices.  That is the difference between being pro choice and pro abortion.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17050</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 18:33:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17050</guid>
					<description>Answer: abortion including partial birth abortion. Just because a child is in the womb doesn't mean it's not alive yet.  Thousands of children who are born prematurely prove that life begins before 40 weeks of gestation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Answer: abortion including partial birth abortion. Just because a child is in the womb doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s not alive yet.  Thousands of children who are born prematurely prove that life begins before 40 weeks of gestation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17034</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 17:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17034</guid>
					<description>Margaret,
How do you "kill an unborn child"?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Margaret,<br />
How do you &#8220;kill an unborn child&#8221;?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: laddijones</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17013</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 14:17:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17013</guid>
					<description>After having lived in this state for over 60 years and participated in politics for most of that time,  I think the election of James Fields in Cullman Alabama is one of the  most significant moments since George Wallace stood in the school house door. As the saying goes, "We've come a long way baby!

laddi</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After having lived in this state for over 60 years and participated in politics for most of that time,  I think the election of James Fields in Cullman Alabama is one of the  most significant moments since George Wallace stood in the school house door. As the saying goes, &#8220;We&#8217;ve come a long way baby!</p>
<p>laddi
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: John</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17008</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 13:01:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-17008</guid>
					<description>Most laughable comment by Mike Hubbard, maybe the worst GOP chair in history, regarding James Fields election (Fields and African-American who won in a 95 percent white district)."Tonight a Democrat seat stayed the status quo.” I don't think Fields' election can remotely be called status quo. Maybe Hubbard should have doled out some of those 3500 football tickets he gets free from Auburn. Hubbard doesn't get it. His brand of hate politics is out of style.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most laughable comment by Mike Hubbard, maybe the worst GOP chair in history, regarding James Fields election (Fields and African-American who won in a 95 percent white district).&#8221;Tonight a Democrat seat stayed the status quo.” I don&#8217;t think Fields&#8217; election can remotely be called status quo. Maybe Hubbard should have doled out some of those 3500 football tickets he gets free from Auburn. Hubbard doesn&#8217;t get it. His brand of hate politics is out of style.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-16990</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-16990</guid>
					<description>I chose the masculine because it is usually the proper gender to talk in when discussing no person in particular.  I don't quite follow your sentence about the second amendment issue though. So should we call people who want others to have the choice to carry guns pro-choice (as to guns) too? Although I am not totally certain what the government's role should be in regulating abortions, I think the life of the fetus should have some bearing also. To tell the truth, I was stronger pro-choice until my first ultra-sound and seeing that child raised hard to answer questions about the right to kill an unborn child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I chose the masculine because it is usually the proper gender to talk in when discussing no person in particular.  I don&#8217;t quite follow your sentence about the second amendment issue though. So should we call people who want others to have the choice to carry guns pro-choice (as to guns) too? Although I am not totally certain what the government&#8217;s role should be in regulating abortions, I think the life of the fetus should have some bearing also. To tell the truth, I was stronger pro-choice until my first ultra-sound and seeing that child raised hard to answer questions about the right to kill an unborn child.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-16989</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:06:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-16989</guid>
					<description>Margaret,
You said "If a person supports the right to choose arbortion, then he is truly for abortions". First of all, "HE" can never choose have an abortion.  If a person says they are in favor of the second amendment/ the right to own guns , it means they are pro gun rights. I think it's splitting hairs to say that pro choice means pro abortion.  No one can make anyone have an abortion that doesn't want to have an abortion, just as no one can make anyone carry a gun that doesn't want to carry one.  It's about a womans right to have total control over her reproductive system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Margaret,<br />
You said &#8220;If a person supports the right to choose arbortion, then he is truly for abortions&#8221;. First of all, &#8220;HE&#8221; can never choose have an abortion.  If a person says they are in favor of the second amendment/ the right to own guns , it means they are pro gun rights. I think it&#8217;s splitting hairs to say that pro choice means pro abortion.  No one can make anyone have an abortion that doesn&#8217;t want to have an abortion, just as no one can make anyone carry a gun that doesn&#8217;t want to carry one.  It&#8217;s about a womans right to have total control over her reproductive system.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-16980</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2008/01/28/the-most-important-legislative-special-election-in-the-history-of-alabama/#comment-16980</guid>
					<description>I'm not.  I am not really in favor of the death penalty. But I still don't see your difference, anonymous.  You are either for a woman being able to choose abortion or not. If a person supports the right to choose abortion, then he is truly for abortions. Similarly, if a person says we have a right to own guns, he is said to be pro-gun. Don't assume I am totally against the right to choose abortions (as I can't really make up my mind what is best) but I think it is less than splitting hairs when you say pro-choice is not pro-abortion.

I thought of another nasty ad from the last election.  The Democrat who ran against Arthur Orr actually accused him of causing a little girl to get cancer. The ad showed a little girl about 4 years old in her swimsuit and made a claim that some gas station Orr has a connection to gave her leukemia.  I don't think there was any basis for the claim. Both parties are guilty of running nasty and untrue attack ads and it is naive to think one party is not participating in this sort of behavior.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not.  I am not really in favor of the death penalty. But I still don&#8217;t see your difference, anonymous.  You are either for a woman being able to choose abortion or not. If a person supports the right to choose abortion, then he is truly for abortions. Similarly, if a person says we have a right to own guns, he is said to be pro-gun. Don&#8217;t assume I am totally against the right to choose abortions (as I can&#8217;t really make up my mind what is best) but I think it is less than splitting hairs when you say pro-choice is not pro-abortion.</p>
<p>I thought of another nasty ad from the last election.  The Democrat who ran against Arthur Orr actually accused him of causing a little girl to get cancer. The ad showed a little girl about 4 years old in her swimsuit and made a claim that some gas station Orr has a connection to gave her leukemia.  I don&#8217;t think there was any basis for the claim. Both parties are guilty of running nasty and untrue attack ads and it is naive to think one party is not participating in this sort of behavior.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
