<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Exxon Judgment Struck Down</title>
	<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/11/02/exxon-judgment-struck-down/</link>
	<description>&#038; Home of Lawn Mower Repair</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/11/02/exxon-judgment-struck-down/#comment-12262</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/11/02/exxon-judgment-struck-down/#comment-12262</guid>
					<description>You're welcome, Kathy!  I think I fixed the other problem also (the expanding comment box for IE6 users).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re welcome, Kathy!  I think I fixed the other problem also (the expanding comment box for IE6 users).
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: walt moffett</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/11/02/exxon-judgment-struck-down/#comment-12234</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 04:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/11/02/exxon-judgment-struck-down/#comment-12234</guid>
					<description>Now its time to see if the Legislature's Visa will cover a roll or three of duct tape.  

Next session will be a gut cruncher for a lot of agencies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now its time to see if the Legislature&#8217;s Visa will cover a roll or three of duct tape.  </p>
<p>Next session will be a gut cruncher for a lot of agencies.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Flashpoint &#187; Blog Archive &#187; $3.6 Billion Exxon Award Overturned</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/11/02/exxon-judgment-struck-down/#comment-12228</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Nov 2007 02:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/11/02/exxon-judgment-struck-down/#comment-12228</guid>
					<description>[...] Doc&#8217;s viewed the decision through the prism of lawmakers who had been lusting at the windfall.  He included a quote from Rep. Yusuf Salaam who viewed the potential payoff not as an opportunity to relieve the tax burden on Alabamians, but as a chance to implement &#8220;progressive&#8221; legislation.  Translation: he wanted to kick start a bunch of unnecessary programs with money that would soon be gone at which point he would wail on the House floor that we needed to raise taxes to fund those &#8220;essential&#8221; programs. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Doc&#8217;s viewed the decision through the prism of lawmakers who had been lusting at the windfall.  He included a quote from Rep. Yusuf Salaam who viewed the potential payoff not as an opportunity to relieve the tax burden on Alabamians, but as a chance to implement &#8220;progressive&#8221; legislation.  Translation: he wanted to kick start a bunch of unnecessary programs with money that would soon be gone at which point he would wail on the House floor that we needed to raise taxes to fund those &#8220;essential&#8221; programs. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/11/02/exxon-judgment-struck-down/#comment-12200</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 16:09:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/11/02/exxon-judgment-struck-down/#comment-12200</guid>
					<description>I see Tom Parker wrote the opinion.  No wonder it took so long...

(Thanks for the comment preview!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see Tom Parker wrote the opinion.  No wonder it took so long&#8230;</p>
<p>(Thanks for the comment preview!)
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
