<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dems &#8220;Make Noise&#8221; About AL-02</title>
	<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/</link>
	<description>&#038; Home of Lawn Mower Repair</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 12:25:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: wiregrass voter</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/#comment-11863</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 18:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/#comment-11863</guid>
					<description>to walt's comment - i would like to see a good race too but the real race , I think, will be in the republican primary.  unfortunately, as of now, i don't see a lot of great candidates to replace Everett.  A few interesting ones but no one that seems to blow me away so to speak.  we will see who actually runs though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>to walt&#8217;s comment - i would like to see a good race too but the real race , I think, will be in the republican primary.  unfortunately, as of now, i don&#8217;t see a lot of great candidates to replace Everett.  A few interesting ones but no one that seems to blow me away so to speak.  we will see who actually runs though.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: walt moffett</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/#comment-11860</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 17:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/#comment-11860</guid>
					<description>I see the points raised but remember competition improves the breed, whether its Fords, horses or grocery stores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the points raised but remember competition improves the breed, whether its Fords, horses or grocery stores.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: dan t</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/#comment-11853</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 14:48:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/#comment-11853</guid>
					<description>Wiregrass is probably correct. Even if Bright did run he would
face an uphill battle given the political leanings of this state
and who the dems will have at the top of their ticket next year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wiregrass is probably correct. Even if Bright did run he would<br />
face an uphill battle given the political leanings of this state<br />
and who the dems will have at the top of their ticket next year.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: ptclearer</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/#comment-11814</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:43:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/#comment-11814</guid>
					<description>Bobby Bright could win that seat.  He doesn't have a voting record, is well liked by business, and has deep roots in the District.  If the Democrats can convince Mayor Bright to win, watch out.  Otherwise, it will be very tough for Democrats to win the seat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby Bright could win that seat.  He doesn&#8217;t have a voting record, is well liked by business, and has deep roots in the District.  If the Democrats can convince Mayor Bright to win, watch out.  Otherwise, it will be very tough for Democrats to win the seat.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: wiregrass voter</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/#comment-11812</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 02:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/#comment-11812</guid>
					<description>They are better served to put money where it will produce results.  AL District 2 has been in Republican hands since the Goldwater days...it ain't gonna change in '08 either.  But their decision to put money in the race will all depend on the candidate.  If its is Spicer for example they will not waste their cash but if it is Bright they may spend some money on a candidate they actually consider viable.  But with a Presidential election with Hillary likely on the ticket, that will only serve to drive out Republican votes all the way down the ticket, especially in District 2 voting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are better served to put money where it will produce results.  AL District 2 has been in Republican hands since the Goldwater days&#8230;it ain&#8217;t gonna change in &#8216;08 either.  But their decision to put money in the race will all depend on the candidate.  If its is Spicer for example they will not waste their cash but if it is Bright they may spend some money on a candidate they actually consider viable.  But with a Presidential election with Hillary likely on the ticket, that will only serve to drive out Republican votes all the way down the ticket, especially in District 2 voting.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: walt moffett</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/#comment-11810</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Oct 2007 01:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/10/26/dems-make-noise-about-al-02/#comment-11810</guid>
					<description>Good to see the Democrats won't concede the seats but will they put the effort into the races to win?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to see the Democrats won&#8217;t concede the seats but will they put the effort into the races to win?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.377 seconds -->
