Birmingham Mayoral Election Contested

Birmingham's Statue of VulcanElection results are certified that name Larry Langford the new mayor of Birmingham, but runner-up Patrick Cooper is challenging the election on the grounds that Langford did not meet residency requirements. The Terminal has a copy of the papers Cooper filed with the court asking for a new election with the remaining eligible candidates. I found it interesting.

Fox 6 News has posted a copy of Langford’s motion (pdf) to dismiss the contest (via The Terminal).

Related Articles:

3 comments to Birmingham Mayoral Election Contested

  • anonymous

    It is time to stop this type of fraudulent behavior…Would you want this type person to run your City? And why is Langford just now reporting money he received several years ago? Seems “big money” is behind all this. Want “big money” running Birmingham?

  • Anonymous

    I don’t want big money running Birmingham. I don’t want small minds running Birmingham either.

  • Don

    “Birmingham’s Mayor-Council Act requires that the mayor be a qualified elector of the city and be at least 25 years old. It requires a candidate to sign a sworn statement when qualifying stating that the candidate ‘resides’ in Birmingham.”

    Those residency requirements are much different that those for a state senator or representative.

    SECTION 47 of the Alabama Constitution says, “Senators shall be at least twenty-five years of age, and representatives twenty-one years of age at the time of their election. They shall have been citizens and residents of this state for three years and residents of their respective counties or districts for one year next before their election, if such county or district shall have been so long established; but if not, then of the county or district from which the same shall have been taken; and they shall reside in their respective counties or districts during their terms of office.”

    It continues to baffle me how Senator Wendell Mitchell can reside in a mansion in Montgomery in Senator Larry Dixon’s district and claim a residency in a P.O. box in Luverne, which is in the district he supposedly represents, and get a way with it. It seems that SD25 is represented by two state senators while SD30 has no constitutional senator representing it.

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

See more Recent Small Town News

 


 

Legislative Dispatch

Senate Passes Ban on No-Bid Contracts–Makes State Government More Accountable

I am very pleased that Senate Republicans joined with the Senate Democratic Caucus this week to pass a major piece of our legislative agenda.  SB 52, sponsored by Senator Lowell Barron, will end the abuse that we have seen of the awarding of no-bid contracts.  During Governor Riley’s seven years in office, he has awarded [...]

Working in the Bubble

I often hear a lot of talk about the bubble of Montgomery. From time to time I am reminded about this and it could never be more glaring than the current debate regarding gambling. As the news media and political ads have taken to the air debating Governor Riley’s raid on Victory Land and Country [...]

Purple Dot Connection

HAPPY FEBRUARY

Under the “B” … June 1 

                 I’ve tried to follow BINGO rules and BINGO raids.  I’m not sure I understand the law, nor do I get the motives of many of the principal players.  I bet many of you know a heck of a lot more about this than I.  But one thing I am [...]


Back in the Day...

Dexter Avenue in Montgomery, 1950s

Vintage postcard