Comments on: Senate District 32 Run-off Tomorrow

by: Anonymous

Tue, 11 Sep 2007 03:06:50 +0000

Danny, you are correct….my post “9″ was nothing more than a verification of a contribution that was mentioned. You show your
independence more and more by being able to read what was actually said…as opposed to some that must believe there is something
between the lines. Keep up the great blogging and research that you do. You are a treasured source for all that are interested in
the truth of politics.

by: Danny

Tue, 11 Sep 2007 02:01:29 +0000

The point by anonymous in comment #9, as I understand it, is to verify that Bradley Byrne accepted $500 along with an endorsement from what this flyer calls “a liberal extremist group.” Which demonstrates how silly the flyer is.

Commenter in #14, I have no dog in this fight. My point is summed up in the next to last sentence of the post. However, if you would like to demonstrate that any particular point of the post is unfair or untrue, I am glad to hear it. But I don’t believe you can point to anything there that is not true. I am sorry if the truth has a bias against your candidate.

by: Biased?

Tue, 11 Sep 2007 01:04:19 +0000

Wow, what an unbiased posting by “Danny”. I didn’t know Tripp Pittman was running a blog!

by: AJ in foley

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:54:57 +0000

I can’t speak to what was offered, but I do find it interesting that when comparing individual contributions, Trip has Randy beat hands down…. Perhaps the $100 Randy returened wouldn’t seem so insignificant under that light.

by: Anonymous

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:52:34 +0000

Will:

**BINGO**

by: Will

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 23:19:17 +0000

The question should then become exactly how much PAC money was Pittman going to raise anyway. If all we are talking about is a single PAC donation of $500, refusing all PAC donations makes more political sense than taking the $500. It reminds me of when Roy Moore declined to accept any PAC money during his run for Governor. It’s very easy to turn something down when one is not offered it in the first place.

by: AJ in Foley

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 22:31:11 +0000

The fact that they did not give Pittman money is not a negative… He refused all Pac money, so I’m not sure what #9 is getting at.

by: Anonymous

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 21:27:57 +0000

I did some checking (took me a while because of Conservation Alabama’s name change) and they (AlaLEAVs Pac) indeed gave Byrne $500.00 reported
on 7/01/2002 on Byrne’s disclosures with the secretary of state’s office. That’s $500 more than Pittman got from them according
to the story.

by: Danny

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 20:07:57 +0000

Susan, your helpfulness is appreciated and no apology is necessary.

Anonymous in 5, funny.

by: Susan

Mon, 10 Sep 2007 18:53:59 +0000

Danny, my inference is from your wording. My experience is that when candidate is ahead ALFA says they are ahead. When they are behind they say
the candidate “could win.” I have no direct knowledge of any polling, ALFA or otherwise, for that race. I assumed you were repeating ALFA’s wording. For that, I apologize.