Most of the readers here did not see and hear any smear tactics that came from Pittman – particularly since most of the readers don’t live in Senate District 32. Could you tell us specifically what they were?

The observer I talked to from the Senate District told me that McKinney’s ads were more “pointed,” i.e. negative, than Pittman’s, and that Pittman might should have been more pointed himself. He gave me examples of McKinney’s ads.

Some really took offense at McKinney’s ad saying that Democratic Party Chair Joe Turnham supports Pittman, when that was based on an endorsement from a group that Turnham has not been a part of for years.

I haven’t heard any specific examples of how Pittman was campaigning negatively. Could you provide some?

Thank you.

Danny

On another note, Mckinney clearly has the support of Montgomery, and possibly the AEA. The interesting thing about the smear phone calls is that one was based out of Montgomery, the other out of Mobile… (Do a Blue page search of the number) My caller ID listed the numbers as “Alabam…” It sounds like someone with the capabilities to use Phone tree messaging… Am I the only one who recieved phone messages from someone other than Mckinney? Interesting to note the numbers were from the same address.

Sum up: if you want to know who’s leaving the slanderous messages, use available resources and do so… Stop randomly blaming candidates. I’ve presented readers with what I’ve found using online blue pages. you can do the same for yourself if you’d like.

Interesting, when Alfa is running his campaign and they have canceled thousands of policies on the coast.

And everytime I see some sort of ad for McKinney, he’s in a loving embrace with Bob Riley. Baldwin County is tired of their property taxes going through the roof, and they lay the blame at the Governor’s feet.

McKinney answers to the political muscle of Montgomery, pure and simple.