<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Additions to Alabama Line</title>
	<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/</link>
	<description>&#038; Home of Lawn Mower Repair</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7818</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 05:56:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7818</guid>
					<description>David, these odds are meant to inform, entertain, and provoke, and they reflect a consensus of people from both sides of the aisle who are smarter than I am about these things.  For example, folks on both side of the aisle said that David Bronner would definitely rate even higher and potentially be a strong candidate if he actually were showing signs of running.  As for Stan Pate, well... 75 to 1 represents quite long odds.  That means if the race were held one thousand times, he would win about thirteen times.  A tiny chance.  

And of course at the end of the day, it's subjective, so people will disagree.  And perhaps they/we will be informed, entertained, and/or provoked.  (And granted, you may be right that those names have zero chance.  But I would be reluctant to say that they have ZERO chance at this point.)

Thanks, SamfordDem.

Leroy, unlike those two, I think I am speechless on that one.

Anonymous in comment #6, we would need her name.  And party affiliation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, these odds are meant to inform, entertain, and provoke, and they reflect a consensus of people from both sides of the aisle who are smarter than I am about these things.  For example, folks on both side of the aisle said that David Bronner would definitely rate even higher and potentially be a strong candidate if he actually were showing signs of running.  As for Stan Pate, well&#8230; 75 to 1 represents quite long odds.  That means if the race were held one thousand times, he would win about thirteen times.  A tiny chance.  </p>
<p>And of course at the end of the day, it&#8217;s subjective, so people will disagree.  And perhaps they/we will be informed, entertained, and/or provoked.  (And granted, you may be right that those names have zero chance.  But I would be reluctant to say that they have ZERO chance at this point.)</p>
<p>Thanks, SamfordDem.</p>
<p>Leroy, unlike those two, I think I am speechless on that one.</p>
<p>Anonymous in comment #6, we would need her name.  And party affiliation.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Leroy</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7799</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 22:53:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7799</guid>
					<description>How about Russ or Dee Fine?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about Russ or Dee Fine?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: SamfordDem</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7795</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 20:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7795</guid>
					<description>Pate shouldn't be eliminated altogether but his odds should be in the same realm as Loretta Nall's/  Same for Charles Bishop.  Otherwise, I would say the line seems pretty accurate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pate shouldn&#8217;t be eliminated altogether but his odds should be in the same realm as Loretta Nall&#8217;s/  Same for Charles Bishop.  Otherwise, I would say the line seems pretty accurate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: David</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7791</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:50:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7791</guid>
					<description>In order to be taken seriously, the Alabama Line needs to be more realistic about candidates running for office. There is now way Jack Hawkins, David Bronner or Stan Pate have a chance to become Governor. Just like there are 10 dems and 10 repubs. running for president, only 3-4 are taken seriously. Let's weed out the Alabama Line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In order to be taken seriously, the Alabama Line needs to be more realistic about candidates running for office. There is now way Jack Hawkins, David Bronner or Stan Pate have a chance to become Governor. Just like there are 10 dems and 10 repubs. running for president, only 3-4 are taken seriously. Let&#8217;s weed out the Alabama Line.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7784</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 19:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7784</guid>
					<description>If you've got Stan Pate at 75-1, you might as well put my dead grandmother at 76-1 because pate's got about as much chance as she does of being elected governor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;ve got Stan Pate at 75-1, you might as well put my dead grandmother at 76-1 because pate&#8217;s got about as much chance as she does of being elected governor.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Court Jester</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7773</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:25:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7773</guid>
					<description>MAJOR picture foul re comment 4!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MAJOR picture foul re comment 4!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7772</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7772</guid>
					<description>Anon -- you forget looking almost exactly like a lizard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon &#8212; you forget looking almost exactly like a lizard.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The World Around You &#187; Blog Archive &#187; David Bronner or Stan Pate for Governor?</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7771</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 15:10:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7771</guid>
					<description>[...] Additions to Alabama Line » Doc’s Political Parlor  Posted Alabama Politics on Tuesday, August 7th, 2007. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Additions to Alabama Line » Doc’s Political Parlor  Posted Alabama Politics on Tuesday, August 7th, 2007. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Roy</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7768</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:30:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7768</guid>
					<description>Do those things increase or decrease his odds of being elected Governor in this state?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do those things increase or decrease his odds of being elected Governor in this state?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7767</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 14:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/08/07/additions-to-alabama-line/#comment-7767</guid>
					<description>If I may offer a suggestion:  Your formula may have a flaw in that it does not take
into account past visits to "Anger Management" classes per a court order OR a 
business relationship with Milton McGregor OR the hiring of a felon as his personal 
aide.  All things that are verifiably tied to Stan Pate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I may offer a suggestion:  Your formula may have a flaw in that it does not take<br />
into account past visits to &#8220;Anger Management&#8221; classes per a court order OR a<br />
business relationship with Milton McGregor OR the hiring of a felon as his personal<br />
aide.  All things that are verifiably tied to Stan Pate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
