Comments on: Mr. Riley Goes to Washington http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/ & Home of Lawn Mower Repair Wed, 08 Oct 2008 02:40:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5 by: Kathy http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6414 Tue, 03 Jul 2007 14:40:26 +0000 http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6414 Why would they make it up? Riley going to Washington to discuss potential political fallout is not evidence of a conspiracy; it's smart politics. All this hand-wringing and pearl-clutching are starting to get amusing. These people are politicians. Why should we be surprised if they're trying to control the spin on this story? The nasty tone of the Riley staff's rebuttal smacks of protesting too much. It would be nice if they'd just say yep, that's what we're doing -- so what? -- but I'm not holding my breath. Why would they make it up? Riley going to Washington to discuss potential political fallout is not evidence of a conspiracy; it’s smart politics. All this hand-wringing and pearl-clutching are starting to get amusing. These people are politicians. Why should we be surprised if they’re trying to control the spin on this story?

The nasty tone of the Riley staff’s rebuttal smacks of protesting too much. It would be nice if they’d just say yep, that’s what we’re doing — so what? — but I’m not holding my breath.

]]> by: Anonymous http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6400 Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:03:33 +0000 http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6400 No reason to make it up? I can think of two current inmates in Atlanta who have a reason. No reason to make it up? I can think of two current inmates in Atlanta who have a reason.

]]> by: Anonymous http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6399 Tue, 03 Jul 2007 02:30:30 +0000 http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6399 The Real Tim doesn't believe in conspiracies. Except the one about Harper's and some commenter here conspiring to make up a story that no one would have any reason to make up. That he can believe. ROFLMAO The Real Tim doesn’t believe in conspiracies.

Except the one about Harper’s and some commenter here conspiring to make up a story that no one would have any reason to make up.

That he can believe.

ROFLMAO

]]> by: the Real Tim http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6387 Mon, 02 Jul 2007 19:21:55 +0000 http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6387 SanfordDem: yeah right. SanfordDem: yeah right.

]]> by: SamdfordDem http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6385 Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:54:42 +0000 http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6385 I've got family in Cullman (most of whom are GOP) and they say they were told Riley's trip to Washington was related to the Siegelman conviction. I’ve got family in Cullman (most of whom are GOP) and they say they were told Riley’s trip to Washington was related to the Siegelman conviction.

]]> by: the Real Tim http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6381 Mon, 02 Jul 2007 14:31:32 +0000 http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6381 Apparently, Harper's isn't a very reliable source. Apparently, Harper’s isn’t a very reliable source.

]]> by: The World Around You » Blog Archive » Doc Clarifies His Position on Mr. Riley Goes to Washington http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6355 Sun, 01 Jul 2007 12:44:36 +0000 http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/30/mr-riley-goes-to-washington/#comment-6355 [...] I thank Doc for his clarification. It might be better to be clearer about what you’re implying in the future though. Harper’s is certainly a reliable source, but they have gone a little overboard with the Siegelman situation and are stepping beyond the bounds of sound journalism in some instances. Posted Alabama Politics, Blogging on Sunday, July 1st, 2007. [...] […] I thank Doc for his clarification. It might be better to be clearer about what you’re implying in the future though. Harper’s is certainly a reliable source, but they have gone a little overboard with the Siegelman situation and are stepping beyond the bounds of sound journalism in some instances. Posted Alabama Politics, Blogging on Sunday, July 1st, 2007. […]

]]>