<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Siegelman Sentence Sends Riley to DC</title>
	<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/</link>
	<description>&#038; Home of Lawn Mower Repair</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mr. Riley Goes to Washington &#187; Doc&#8217;s Political Parlor</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-7288</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 08:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-7288</guid>
					<description>[...] Thursday we cited The Cullman Times saying that Gov. Bob Riley had &#8220;unexpected business&#8221; in Washington at &#8220;a high level meeting.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Thursday we cited The Cullman Times saying that Gov. Bob Riley had &#8220;unexpected business&#8221; in Washington at &#8220;a high level meeting.&#8221; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Flashpoint</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6346</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6346</guid>
					<description>[...] I suspect that the primary blog in question is Doc&#8217;s Political Parlor, which published this post on the matter.  There were other blogs that proffered such speculation, but none with the solid history of political neutrality and bona fide access to insiders to rival Doc&#8217;s that would incite an actual response from the Gov&#8217;s office..      By Brian, June 30, 2007, 9:39 pm [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I suspect that the primary blog in question is Doc&#8217;s Political Parlor, which published this post on the matter.  There were other blogs that proffered such speculation, but none with the solid history of political neutrality and bona fide access to insiders to rival Doc&#8217;s that would incite an actual response from the Gov&#8217;s office..      By Brian, June 30, 2007, 9:39 pm [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6332</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 14:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6332</guid>
					<description>Hey, "Losing Credibility Fast", is your other name "REALGOPGIRL"?  Because you sound a lot like a sock puppet to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, &#8220;Losing Credibility Fast&#8221;, is your other name &#8220;REALGOPGIRL&#8221;?  Because you sound a lot like a sock puppet to me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Losing Credibility Fast</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6328</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 13:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6328</guid>
					<description>Dan, your blog is losing credibility rapidly with stuff like this.  Haven't you noticed how every single "source" on this thing is from the area around Cullman County?  You are lumping yourself in with fringe characters and your blog is becoming a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan, your blog is losing credibility rapidly with stuff like this.  Haven&#8217;t you noticed how every single &#8220;source&#8221; on this thing is from the area around Cullman County?  You are lumping yourself in with fringe characters and your blog is becoming a joke.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: walt moffett</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6321</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 02:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6321</guid>
					<description>Terry, during the Craddick - Baxley keruffle, a multi generation xerox of an affadavit by a state parolee was circulating in gas stations and other places alleging various indiscretions by Craddick.

Overall, though I still Artur Davis's take was the most balanced I've seen.

For the conspiracy theorists, Riley is a Mason, Bush is connected to Skull and Bones, both are connected to the Illuminati.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terry, during the Craddick - Baxley keruffle, a multi generation xerox of an affadavit by a state parolee was circulating in gas stations and other places alleging various indiscretions by Craddick.</p>
<p>Overall, though I still Artur Davis&#8217;s take was the most balanced I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>For the conspiracy theorists, Riley is a Mason, Bush is connected to Skull and Bones, both are connected to the Illuminati.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Lurker</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6319</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:19:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6319</guid>
					<description>Alright, the next time any one of your says anything about James McGreevy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, the next time any one of your says anything about James McGreevy&#8230;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Terry</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6318</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6318</guid>
					<description>You are right.  Anyone can sign an affidavit to anything....but they don't do they?  Google around and see how many stories there are about false allegations involving affidavits.  Not many if any.  Why?  They are sworn statements, and if ever introduced by another party in a lawsuit, become grounds for charges.  Would these powerful men not have already squashed this story if it so obviously not true?  Perhaps they know, as Simpson alludes, that she has the back up phone records and other documents.  Also, perhaps she has other information gathered from her time working for Riley.  Dismiss this one at your own peril.  What's NOT being said by the other guys is deafening.  I love the attacks on Simpson as "crazy" etc.  I am reminded, ironically, of Prosecutor Steve Feaga's comments during the Siegelman trial when the defense attacked Nick Bailey.  Feaga said "deals cut in the bowels of hell are not often witnessed by angels." And he went on to say..."Judge, these are there guys.  We just take 'em where we find 'em."   The sharpest edge of any double edged sword is the one YOU choose not to use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right.  Anyone can sign an affidavit to anything&#8230;.but they don&#8217;t do they?  Google around and see how many stories there are about false allegations involving affidavits.  Not many if any.  Why?  They are sworn statements, and if ever introduced by another party in a lawsuit, become grounds for charges.  Would these powerful men not have already squashed this story if it so obviously not true?  Perhaps they know, as Simpson alludes, that she has the back up phone records and other documents.  Also, perhaps she has other information gathered from her time working for Riley.  Dismiss this one at your own peril.  What&#8217;s NOT being said by the other guys is deafening.  I love the attacks on Simpson as &#8220;crazy&#8221; etc.  I am reminded, ironically, of Prosecutor Steve Feaga&#8217;s comments during the Siegelman trial when the defense attacked Nick Bailey.  Feaga said &#8220;deals cut in the bowels of hell are not often witnessed by angels.&#8221; And he went on to say&#8230;&#8221;Judge, these are there guys.  We just take &#8216;em where we find &#8216;em.&#8221;   The sharpest edge of any double edged sword is the one YOU choose not to use.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: mooncat</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6317</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 20:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6317</guid>
					<description>Folks, there are some genuine differing opinions expressed on this thread, but Danny and Kathy have adequately demonstrated that REALGOPGIRL is a troll (dare I say a GOP troll?) posting here to waste your time, raise your blood pressure and hijack the comments thread with silly accusations and non-arguments.  Better to pretend she's in time-out and just ignore her.  You've heard her talking points and she has nothing else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Folks, there are some genuine differing opinions expressed on this thread, but Danny and Kathy have adequately demonstrated that REALGOPGIRL is a troll (dare I say a GOP troll?) posting here to waste your time, raise your blood pressure and hijack the comments thread with silly accusations and non-arguments.  Better to pretend she&#8217;s in time-out and just ignore her.  You&#8217;ve heard her talking points and she has nothing else.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6316</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:32:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6316</guid>
					<description>REALGOPGIRL,

Tell me where I said I believed there was a conspiracy.  Tell me the sentence, the paragraph, the post, where I said there was a conspiracy.  You saying over and over and over that I am a conspiracy theorist doesn't make it true.

Yes, Bush's administration has politicized the DoJ.  Yes, there are some questions worth raising.  I am not saying there is a conspiracy.  I'm not saying there's not.  I have publicly expressed doubt.

But show me where I said there was a conspiracy.  Tell me when I said that.

Show me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>REALGOPGIRL,</p>
<p>Tell me where I said I believed there was a conspiracy.  Tell me the sentence, the paragraph, the post, where I said there was a conspiracy.  You saying over and over and over that I am a conspiracy theorist doesn&#8217;t make it true.</p>
<p>Yes, Bush&#8217;s administration has politicized the DoJ.  Yes, there are some questions worth raising.  I am not saying there is a conspiracy.  I&#8217;m not saying there&#8217;s not.  I have publicly expressed doubt.</p>
<p>But show me where I said there was a conspiracy.  Tell me when I said that.</p>
<p>Show me.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: REALGOPGIRL</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6315</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 19:23:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2007/06/28/siegelman-sentence-sends-riley-to-dc/#comment-6315</guid>
					<description>- or any of the other accusations took place.  Just something...until then, Danny, Dana and Glyn are a bunch of 
loony conspiracy theorists...my opinion</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>- or any of the other accusations took place.  Just something&#8230;until then, Danny, Dana and Glyn are a bunch of<br />
loony conspiracy theorists&#8230;my opinion
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
