Comments on: Campaign Falsehoods

by: Barbara

Wed, 01 Aug 2007 07:55:49 +0000

After all these months, Danny has still refused to explain why the democatric “nominee” in probate place 2 has no opposition in the democratic primary. Danny, what is it that you don’t want your readers to know?

by: Danny

Fri, 03 Nov 2006 15:44:00 +0000

LOL… Anonymous who left the third comment, you have to be kiddding. The last commenter got it right. When the ad says “Funded by Arrington and Hilliard’s Citizen’s Coalition,” how can you defend an out-and-out falsehood like that? Why would Smallwood’s side even fabricate something like that?

by: Anonymous

Fri, 03 Nov 2006 04:56:00 +0000

O come on know–it says “Funded by Richard Arrington and Earl Hilliard”–that is the untruth-the ad is pure and simple race baiting–

by: Anonymous

Fri, 03 Nov 2006 04:48:00 +0000

I didn’t know she was trying to impersonate her father. That is Terrible. I also didn’t realize Judge Smallwood had retired from his second career as a nurse

by: Anonymous

Fri, 03 Nov 2006 04:31:00 +0000

Arrington’s coalition and Hilliard have always endorsed their fellow democrats in the general election. Why would Friday be shocked by this? Will she petition to have the votes from these organizations “disqualified” when they are going to count in her vote total? I think not. Why discount your support? If Richard Arrington, Emory Anthony and Larry Langford choose not to endorse her, she will have no chance and get blown out of the water on the 7th.

by: Lying Smallwoods

Thu, 02 Nov 2006 06:02:00 +0000

This is nothing short of pitiful. This woman is woefully unqualified for the position and has engaged in the worst sort of deceit in order to try to fool the voters. She (and her father) should be ashamed.

by: Anonymous

Thu, 02 Nov 2006 02:01:00 +0000

Smallwood’s false claims are revolting.