<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Poll #&#8217;s Coming</title>
	<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/</link>
	<description>&#038; Home of Lawn Mower Repair</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 04:31:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/#comment-390</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 08:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/#comment-390</guid>
					<description>Anonymous, what Cobb and Nabers poll are you talking about?

Good point, Randi, about who commissioned the poll, but I know no reason to challenge the academic and professional integrity of the USA Polling Group, the University of South Alabama group that handles polls for Mobile's &lt;I&gt;Press-Register&lt;/I&gt;.)

And Randi, Strange has &lt;I&gt;far&lt;/I&gt; outspent Folsom to this point, about 8 to 1, including Strange's primary spending.

An &lt;a HREF="http://www.politicalparlor.net/2006/10/lt-gov-poll-numbers.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;updated post is here&lt;/A&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anonymous, what Cobb and Nabers poll are you talking about?</p>
<p>Good point, Randi, about who commissioned the poll, but I know no reason to challenge the academic and professional integrity of the USA Polling Group, the University of South Alabama group that handles polls for Mobile&#8217;s <I>Press-Register</I>.)</p>
<p>And Randi, Strange has <I>far</I> outspent Folsom to this point, about 8 to 1, including Strange&#8217;s primary spending.</p>
<p>An <a HREF="http://www.politicalparlor.net/2006/10/lt-gov-poll-numbers.html" rel="nofollow">updated post is here</A>.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Randi Bates</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/#comment-389</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/#comment-389</guid>
					<description>Shows Folsom up 43-39.  I wouldn't celebrate yet.  If thst's all he can get after his ads have run, I think it is a bad sign,  First of all Folsom is a known quantity.  Second his positive ads have been unchallenged for several weeks.  If they couldn't get him over or close to 50%, then I don't think he is going to get there.  Strange is back on the air this week and Folsom has a lot of baggage.  He needed more of a bump from his initial media buy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shows Folsom up 43-39.  I wouldn&#8217;t celebrate yet.  If thst&#8217;s all he can get after his ads have run, I think it is a bad sign,  First of all Folsom is a known quantity.  Second his positive ads have been unchallenged for several weeks.  If they couldn&#8217;t get him over or close to 50%, then I don&#8217;t think he is going to get there.  Strange is back on the air this week and Folsom has a lot of baggage.  He needed more of a bump from his initial media buy.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Randi Bates</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/#comment-388</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 16:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/#comment-388</guid>
					<description>Well, it was on the Jim Folsom Website, so I'm not real sure whether it was independent or paid for by the Folsom campaign (would guess the latter).  

http://www.jimfolsomjr.com/poll92906.pdf</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it was on the Jim Folsom Website, so I&#8217;m not real sure whether it was independent or paid for by the Folsom campaign (would guess the latter).  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.jimfolsomjr.com/poll92906.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.jimfolsomjr.com/poll92906.pdf</a>
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Randi Bates</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/#comment-387</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Oct 2006 15:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/#comment-387</guid>
					<description>Is the poll out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is the poll out?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/#comment-386</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/#comment-386</guid>
					<description>also hear it shows Judge Cobb 4 points back of Nabers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also hear it shows Judge Cobb 4 points back of Nabers
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/#comment-385</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Sep 2006 16:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/09/29/new-poll-s-coming/#comment-385</guid>
					<description>could you email me a link to the results or post it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>could you email me a link to the results or post it?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
