<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2003 Gets a Re-Write And So Does&#8230;</title>
	<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/03/27/2003-gets-a-re-write-and-so-does/</link>
	<description>&#038; Home of Lawn Mower Repair</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 20:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Danny</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/03/27/2003-gets-a-re-write-and-so-does/#comment-20</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/03/27/2003-gets-a-re-write-and-so-does/#comment-20</guid>
					<description>Jeff, you are right that the plan was complex, and the complexity certainly didn't help it along any.  Simple good.

Poser, "only" 30% still represented 400,000 Alabamians who were ready to change the way the state taxes people.  I think that conversation has continued for some (or many?) and that has helped the legislature support the Tax Fairness bill that is now going to the Senate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff, you are right that the plan was complex, and the complexity certainly didn&#8217;t help it along any.  Simple good.</p>
<p>Poser, &#8220;only&#8221; 30% still represented 400,000 Alabamians who were ready to change the way the state taxes people.  I think that conversation has continued for some (or many?) and that has helped the legislature support the Tax Fairness bill that is now going to the Senate.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: poser</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/03/27/2003-gets-a-re-write-and-so-does/#comment-19</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/03/27/2003-gets-a-re-write-and-so-does/#comment-19</guid>
					<description>Thank God some people still remember that this was a good idea.  I might have actually been in the 30% group at that time, but I still thought it was a great idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God some people still remember that this was a good idea.  I might have actually been in the 30% group at that time, but I still thought it was a great idea.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/03/27/2003-gets-a-re-write-and-so-does/#comment-18</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Mar 2006 18:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.politicalparlor.net/wp/2006/03/27/2003-gets-a-re-write-and-so-does/#comment-18</guid>
					<description>Well said, sir.

I recall very well the Amend. One days. And I said from the start Riley's package was being presented poorly -- told them as much by email, with suggestions based on my years of living in AL, along with 10 years marketing/advertising experience.

"Tax cut" wins. "Tax reform" loses. Simple good. Complex bad.

Riley made the point in a speech in Hanceville (paraphrase): "Years ago NC was in a similar situation. Here's what they did for education, now look at 'em. WE can do the same things..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, sir.</p>
<p>I recall very well the Amend. One days. And I said from the start Riley&#8217;s package was being presented poorly &#8212; told them as much by email, with suggestions based on my years of living in AL, along with 10 years marketing/advertising experience.</p>
<p>&#8220;Tax cut&#8221; wins. &#8220;Tax reform&#8221; loses. Simple good. Complex bad.</p>
<p>Riley made the point in a speech in Hanceville (paraphrase): &#8220;Years ago NC was in a similar situation. Here&#8217;s what they did for education, now look at &#8216;em. WE can do the same things&#8230;&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
