Alabama Politics in
Doc’s Political Parlor
& Home of Lawn Mower Repair

December 13, 2005

Tuesday 12/13/2005 DAILY NEWS DIGEST

Filed under: Uncategorized — Danny @ 8:42 am

http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/news/113446916320570.xml&coll=2 – Mobile radio host, strong proponent of Ten Commandment actions, decides not to support Moore’s candidacy, fears it could “set in motion cataclysmic events.”

http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/news/113446920620570.xml&coll=2 – Siegelman faces new federal charges.

http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/news/113446903120570.xml&coll=2 – Riley says he will propose returning ETF growth to taxpayers.

http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/news/113446915020570.xml&coll=2 – Alabama drops to 45th in national health ranking.

http://www.al.com/opinion/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/opinion/113446909920570.xml&coll=2 – Editorial calls for legislature to move quickly in addressing crisis in Department of Corrections.

http://www.al.com/news/huntsvilletimes/index.ssf?/base/news/113446898020520.xml&coll=1 – Arise pushes for changes in state’s tax laws.

http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051213/NEWS02/512130318/1009 - Legislators say proposal to remove racist language from Constitution unlikely in 2006.

http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/051213/cuts.shtml - State faces big federal fund losses with proposed ‘06 budget cuts.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

December 12, 2005

Monday 12/12/2005 DAILY NEWS DIGEST

Filed under: Uncategorized — Danny @ 1:16 pm

 

http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051212/NEWS/512120325/1001 - AG Troy King declines to join other attorneys general in requesting movies to include anti-tobacco ads.

http://www.al.com/opinion/mobileregister/index.ssf?/base/opinion/113438270858690.xml&coll=3 – Editorial calls for overhaul of state’s open records law.

http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/news/113438295858701.xml&coll=2 – Federal Court monitor says health care services improving at Tutwiler Prison.

http://www.al.com/opinion/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/opinion/113438276258701.xml&coll=2 – Editorial on ethics charges pending against Sen. Hank Sanders.

http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051212/NEWS/512120321/1007/NEWS02 - State prisoners overcrowd county jails.

FROM TODAY’S ANNISTON STAR:

EDITORIALS

Irresponsible cuts in the House

In our opinion
12-12-2005

In recent days, the U.S. House has had more of the feel of a funny farm than a place where legislation is molded.

Here we are in the middle of a war, with a ballooning budget deficit, with a massive clean-up of New Orleans and the Gulf Coast ahead of us, and what do our lawmakers in the House of Representatives do? They take up tax cuts.

Oh yes, the members did agree on one bipartisan piece of legislation that adjusted the alternative minimum tax (AMT), that provision in the tax code that prevents the wealthy from sheltering their income from Uncle Sam. The House properly corrected the AMT to exclude millions of middle-income taxpayers.

Unfortunately, the rest of the tax-cutting package is downright irresponsible.

Almost $60 billion in additional cuts were passed with the help of only nine Democrats. The rest of the “yeas” came from Republicans, including our own Mike Rogers. Democrats, one by one, made their way to the floor of the chamber to speak against the tax cuts, pointing out that the nation was at war and that we all need to make sacrifices. Republicans, one by one, accused the other side of the aisle of fomenting class warfare.

What a despicable accusation to make.

Has it been lost on the supporters of these bills that Congress is moving at the same time to slice more than $40 billion in social welfare programs including food stamps? If they want to accuse someone of sparking class warfare, perhaps they should look at themselves.

We can only hope that saner minds from the Senate will prevail during conference committee and weaken these bills. In the Senate, a few courageous Republicans are more willing to buck the president and the party leadership.

It’s a lesson Rep. Rogers and his colleagues should learn.

 

About our editorial page

 

Address letters to Speak Out, The Anniston Star, P.O. Box 189, Anniston, AL 36202. Please limit letters to 200 words. Letters may be edited for length, libel and taste. All letters are confirmed with the author before publication.

 

 

 

 

December 11, 2005

Sunday 12/11/2005 DAILY NEWS DIGEST

Filed under: Uncategorized — G @ 5:53 pm

http://www.al.com/opinion/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/opinion/113429648540360.xml&coll=2 – Editorial praises the work of the Black Belt Action Commission.

http://www.al.com/opinion/mobileregister/index.ssf?/base/opinion/113429626840310.xml&coll=3&thispage=1 – Alabama Roadbuilders exec Billy Norrell’s commentary on the need for additional gasoline taxes.

http://www.decaturdaily.com/decaturdaily/news/051211/siegelman.shtml - Prosecutors says case against Siegelman difficult to prove; money allegedly went to campaign coffers, not to benefit Siegelman personally.

http://www.gadsdentimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051211/NEWS/512110333/1016/NEWS01 - DOT makes case for gasoline increase.

http://www.gadsdentimes.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051211/NEWS/512110337/1050/OPINION01 - Gadsden Times editorial on efforts of Montgomery City Council committee to craft landlord tenant protections may pave the way for state to take action.

http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051211/OPINION01/512110301/1012/OPINION - Editorial outlines barriers, including costs, of access to public records.

http://www.tuscaloosanews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051211/NEWS/512110345/1013/EDITORIAL2 - Dana Beyerle’s weekly political column for the NYTimes regional papers.

FROM THE ANNISTON STAR:

The following article appeared originally last week in the Montgomery Advertiser.  It appeared as an AP story in today’s papers in Tuscaloosa, Anniston, Gadsden, and Florence,

Lack of state landlord law leaves tenants unprotected

By Sebastian Kitchen
Associated Press

12-11-2005

MONTGOMERY — When someone used Lottie Manner’s bathroom upstairs, water gushed through the ceiling and drenched her living room below.

Flush the toilet or unplug the tub, and water would come pouring down. All the water left mold and a stench.

“When you drain the tub, it pours down like it is raining down here in my living room,” said Manner, who moved from Ohio earlier this year. “They sent somebody out here to look at it, but they didn’t do anything.”

Her property management company, the J.M. Harrison Agency, knew about the problems and in a letter, the agency said it tried to fix them.

But it really didn’t have to because there’s no state landlord-tenant law requiring it to.

Alabama and nearby Arkansas are the only states that don’t have landlord-tenant laws. The other 48 states protect renters’ rights and about half the states share the same law, according to Robert McCurley of the Alabama Law Institute, a nonpartisan agency that drafts major bills.

The institute drafted the one landlord-tenant bill — dozens have been introduced over the years — that made it out of a Senate committee last year. That sole survivor was never voted on by the full Senate.

While most legislators agree on the need for a landlord-tenant law, they can’t settle on how to balance the rights of the owner and renter.

“Landlords shouldn’t be afraid of this legislation,” said John Pickens of the Alabama Appleseed Center for Law & Justice, which with Alabama Arise, Legal Services of Alabama and the Southern Poverty Law Center have been vocal in supporting a bill.

“If they take care of the premises and do what’s right, there is nothing to be feared in this legislation,” said Pickens, the center’s executive director.

Greg Masood of the Alabama Association of Realtors countered that requirements on property managers would increase the cost of business and mean higher rents.

“It is a perfectly noble goal to want to improve conditions for those who live in rental property, but at the same time some of the bills to us seem to impact those the most who can afford to pay the least,” he said.

Rebekah Young of the Southern Poverty Law Center contended legislators don’t pass a landlord-tenant law because it goes against their financial interest.

In 2002, almost 42 percent of Alabama state legislators disclosed that they owned or had interest in rental property, according to the Center for Public Integrity.

More legislators had “outside ties,” a personal or professional link, to rental property than other category. About 17.5 percent listed real estate.

Alabama’s inaction spurred Montgomery to study enacting a landlord-tenant ordinance. The city has nearly 30,000 rental units. Of those, 21,000 are duplexes or apartments, and 9,000 are houses.

“It’s the Legislature’s fault for not addressing the issue,” said Young, who has been working with the council members to come up with a proposal. “What else are municipalities supposed to do? Their only recourse is to draft ordinances.”

Spearheading the city’s effort is Councilwoman Janet May. She wants an inventory and regular inspections of rental units, and she wants landlords to register with or be licensed by the city.

Real estate agent Sandra Nickel liked the idea of inspecting a unit when the tenant changes, something required in other communities.

“If we had such a thing,” Nickel said, “then I think most of our other issues would take care of themselves.”

May expects the planning, development and transportation standing committee, which she chairs, to forward a proposal to the full council early next year.

“We need to take it and digest it,” she said. “I don’t want to rush.”

Council President Charles Jinright agreed with May about the complexity of the issue. Jinright said he wants to do his own research before making a decision.

Mayor Bobby Bright, though, opposes a landlord-tenant ordinance because it’d cost millions of dollars and would leave the city playing referee between renter and property owner.

“We can’t afford to do what some organizations want us to do to protect the poor,” he said.

Bright conceded there might be a need for improving existing housing codes but doing so simply wouldn’t do any good because the city doesn’t have the manpower to enforce them.

Unless the city or the state acts, tenants such as Manner simply have to put up with the waterworks in their living rooms — or move.

Manner decided to move. J.M. Harrison didn’t return repeated telephone calls for comment. In October, the agency’s Bobby Belcher wrote Manner that a man in her apartment kept workers from making repairs.

Manner denied the accusations.

Belcher also wrote “if you are not there, we will assume you have taken care of these problems yourself.”

The experience left Manner bitter and convinced her of the need for a landlord-tenant law.

“Alabama is so far behind everything and everybody,” Manner said. “It is just a shame.”

———

Calhoun County’s ‘executioner’ busy during holiday season

By Jenny Bone Miller
Star Staff Writer

12-11-2005

Deputy Tomas Hall hasn’t thrown any Christmas trees to the curb this year.

“But that could happen,” Hall acknowledges. “I’ve had to throw decorated trees with the presents under them out three times before.”

Hall, a grandfather with a kind smile, is known as “the executioner,” because he physically ejects people when the court orders a writ of execution, evicting them from their homes.

Evictions in the county typically triple in December.

The reason for that is unclear. It could be that landlords are tired of letting tenants slide on their rents and want to get their books in order at the end of the year, as District Judge Larry Warren theorizes. Or it could be that people are spending their money on Christmas presents instead of rent, as one landlord said.

Last year, there were about 1,200 evictions in the county. Some of those tenants moved out before Hall knocked on their doors.

“They have plenty of notice,” Hall said. “If they don’t get out, we set them out.”

Tenants get three eviction notices and have a total of 27 days to move out before the Sheriff’s Office moves anything. Hall also calls several times to warn them.

“A lot of people think they can live where they’re at and not have to pay,” said a landlord of several properties who did not wish to be identified. “But if you ain’t paying, you ain’t staying.”

Friday morning, Hall evicted a man who had been renting business space for a car dealership on the Bynum-Leatherwood Road in Anniston. The tenant was not there, so the owners of the property called a locksmith. The tenant had not paid his $550 rent in three months.

A two-toned El Camino on blocks, a rust-coated once-white El Dorado, and a Honda Civic from the 80s with no headlights were among the cars featured on the weedy lot.

“All the neighbors were complaining about how he keeps the place,” said Troy Foster, who works for the owners of the property. “I don’t blame them. I wouldn’t want to look out my window all day and see this.”

Muscular county jail inmates in their early 20s who participate in a work-release program accompanied Hall in his squad car. They would move the contents of the office, a freestanding tin building, to a curb beside the road. That property will be classified as abandoned.

An old man in a mesh hat stopped to peer at some of the chairs, apparently shopping, before the inmates were even finished with their work.

The work took hours. Eighteen dusty batteries were stacked inside the office. Auto parts, tires, loose papers, a piece of a tow truck, dirty toys and empty cans covered the floor so that it was not visible.

Friday’s eviction was one of four Hall performed last week. That’s a typical workload, he said.

“What makes this job easy for me is to be understanding to people,” Hall said. “I believe in the golden rule, treating people how I’d want to be treated if the situation was reversed.”

“I know it’s a bad situation, but we all have problems, and this is not something that you can’t overcome,” he said in his calm way as he would to an evictee, making lots of eye contact.

He said he sometimes puts his arm around the tenants if they want to talk.

If children are present, he sometimes asks parents if he can give them the stuffed animals he keeps in the back of his car.

A few times, he has had to be tough. One young man who was being evicted from his elderly father’s house threatened Hall and set his father’s house on fire.

Another man pointed a shotgun at Hall because he did not want him to repossess his pickup. Seven officers arrived as backup and piled onto the man (Hall, though shaken, remembered to take the pickup when it was all over).

The majority of evictees are people who have had medical problems and bills or people who have lost their jobs, said Judge Warren, who has handled the county’s civil eviction cases for 19 years.

“We usually have a big bump in cases in December,” he said. The court will not serve writs of execution during the week of Christmas.

Because bankruptcy laws became stricter on Oct. 1, the number of people filing for bankruptcy increased. Since they are protected from prosecution after they file for bankruptcy, many stopped paying rent. Now they’re facing eviction.

In Alabama, the only state laws governing the landlord-tenant relationship are those concerning evictions — tenants have no rights. If the heat breaks in an apartment in the dead of winter, for instance, a renter is still obligated to pay rent, even if the dwelling is uninhabitable.

Some evictions occur after a renter refuses to pay rent on a faulty apartment, said Ron Gilbert, policy analyst with the Alabama Arise Foundation in Montgomery. His organization supports legislation that would give tenants stronger rights.

The mentions of Hall on police scanners continue to increase. A resident listening to the police scanner called the Sheriff’s Office a few months ago, disturbed.

“That guy called us up and said, ‘What are these people doing that’s so bad?’” Chief Deputy Matthew Wade said. “He said, ‘ya’ll must be killing three or four people a week. That guy, the executioner, I don’t know how he lives with himself.’”

When Hall heard about the call he threw his head back and laughed.

“I’ve heard that several times. People will be concerned,” he said. “They just don’t understand the court’s terminology.”

Saturday 12/10/2005 DAILY NEWS DIGEST

Filed under: Uncategorized — Danny @ 7:38 am



http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/news/1134209792150600.xml&coll=2 – State’s congressional delegation split on money for Medicaid.

http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/news/1134209841150600.xml&coll=2 – Sen. Sanders files request for Ethics Commission to dismiss complaint.

http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051210/NEWS/512100324/1001 - Three candidates qualify for late Rep. Venable’s seat.

http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051210/OPINION01/512090390/1012/OPINION - Editorial commentary on report which states that no one knows how many boards or commissions exist for state government, not who sits on such entities.

FROM THE ANNISTON STAR:

Bush ratings boosted by rising support from men, whites, Catholics

By Will Lester
Associated Press

12-10-2005

 

 

&ltimg&gt  

WASHINGTON — President Bush’s improved standing with whites, men, Catholics and other core supporters has been a key factor in pushing his job approval rating up to 42 percent. That’s the highest level since summer.

Shifting into campaign mode to reverse his slide in public opinion polls, Bush has boosted his support among key constituency groups — particularly in the Northeast and West — on his handling of Iraq and the economy, an AP-Ipsos poll found.

“Now it’s not a one-sided debate,” said Republican pollster Ed Goeas, citing Bush’s recent speeches on the health of the economy and the high stakes in Iraq. “You have a message getting out there in a much more positive way.”

Bush improved his job approval rating from 37 percent in November to 42 percent now, though his standing with the public remains relatively low. Fifty-seven percent still disapprove, down from 61.

Bush spent much of the year pushing for a Social Security plan that went nowhere, and he was put on the defensive in September and October after the slow government response to Hurricane Katrina.

Those factors combined with Iraq and the price of gasoline hitting $3 a gallon left the president with the lowest public support of his presidency from September through November.

Now, gas prices have eased, and Bush has been barnstorming the country to tout a stronger economy and claim progress in Iraq.

A recent report noted that the nation added 215,000 jobs in November, and Bush declared on Monday that “the best days are yet to come for the American economy.”

On Iraq, he’s halfway through a series of four speeches outlining — in the words of a huge banner behind him at one event — the administration’s “Plan for Victory” in Iraq. He has been claiming new strength for both Iraq’s troops and economy, while acknowledging difficulties caused by continuing violence.

The most important goal of the Iraq speeches is to shore up intensity of support with his Republican base, said Gary Jacobson, a political scientist at the University of California-San Diego. “If he restores the strong support of Republicans, he can ride out the rest of the term and keep Republican politicians on his side as well,” Jacobson said.

Bush’s job approval among men has climbed from 39 percent in November to 47 percent now and among whites from 40 percent to 47 percent, according to the AP-Ipsos poll.

Catholics’ approval went from 32 percent to 41 percent. In the Northeast, Bush’s support grew from 27 to 41 percent, and in the West from 34 to 42 percent.

Overall, approval of Bush’s handling of the economy was up to 42 percent in December from 37 percent last month, according to the poll of 1,002 adults taken Dec. 5-7 by Ipsos, an international polling firm. The survey had a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3 percentage points.

The poll found approval for Bush’s handling of Iraq also was up, from 37 percent last month to 41 percent now.

Those disapproving totaled 55 percent on the economy, 58 percent on Iraq, both down slightly from November.

“I think he’s doing what he has to do,” said Charl-Deane Almond, a Republican from Bishop, Calif. “I appreciate him standing strong with all the pressure he’s under.”

Still, many have mixed feelings.

Said Jonathan Schuler, an independent from Georgetown, a small city north of Austin, Texas: “If we stay in Iraq too much longer, it will be another Vietnam. If we pull out, the terrorists will look at it as a victory.”

The people who disapprove of Bush’s performance cite Iraq most often as the leading reason, AP-Ipsos polling found in the fall.

The administration can win support from the public by emphasizing the possibility of success, said political scientist Christopher Gelpi of Duke University.

Gelpi and his colleague and research partner at Duke, Peter Feaver, have concluded from their research that the public is more likely to tolerate some casualties and deaths if people can see that a military mission will be successful. As a special adviser on the National Security Council, Feaver is helping shape administration strategy on winning public support for the war.

While it’s important for the president to talk about victory, Gelpi said, “words without deeds on the ground will ring pretty hollow.”

———

Arctic drilling divide threatens GOP budget plans

By Andrew Taylor
Associated Press

12-10-2005

 

 

&ltimg&gt  

WASHINGTON — A seemingly hopeless divide within the Republican Party over oil drilling in a pristine wildlife refuge in Alaska is threatening to block unrelated budget cuts that are a central pillar of the GOP’s plans for this year.

The battle pits about two dozen pro-environment and newly empowered House Republicans against veteran GOP proponents of drilling who say the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge may hold up to $500 billion worth of oil vital to the nation’s energy needs. Neither side is budging.

“The Senate won’t take anything that doesn’t have some sort of program for ANWR in it, and the House right now won’t take anything that does,” said House Energy and Commerce Committee Chairman Joe Barton, R-Texas.

Year after year, Republican leaders and energy industry supporters like Barton could ignore the two to three dozen House Republicans who opposed drilling in the Alaska refugee because their “no” votes were offset by an equal number of “yes” votes from oil-state Democrats.

But virtually every Democrat in Congress opposes the budget bill because of its cuts in popular social programs, so Republican leaders in the House don’t have that critical support from across the aisle to carry the vote on Alaska drilling.

The impasse threatens plans to deliver to its GOP political base by Christmas about $45 billion in spending cuts over the next five years. The base is uneasy with its party’s performance on spending and budget deficits. Passage of the budget bill is also an important step before Congress can extend expiring tax cuts.

Numerous differences on other policy issues like Medicaid and welfare also are hanging up a final agreement on budget cuts, but Alaska drilling remains the biggest obstacle. It wasn’t supposed to be that way when the budget process began in February.

Even though a majority in both the House and Senate support drilling in the refuge, filibuster threats by drilling opponents in the Senate have always blocked efforts to pass it as part of broader energy legislation. The filibuster threat means it effectively takes 60 votes in the 100-member Senate to pass ANWR drilling under normal rules.

To clear that hurdle this year, Senate advocates of drilling, especially Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, and Energy Committee Chairman Pete Domenici, R-N.M., put the issue on the sweeping budget measure, which cannot be filibustered.

The Arctic drilling plan is eligible for the budget because it would bring the government about $2.5 billion in revenues through oil leases through 2010, say official congressional scorekeepers. Leasing supporters say the revenues could be as high as $5 billion in that time because of high oil prices.

While use of a filibuster-proof budget bill is the only way to get the Arctic drilling plan through the Senate, it gives House GOP opponents of drilling a decisive advantage. The defection of just 14 Republicans can scuttle the entire budget bill if every Democrat votes against it. House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., felt he had no choice but to strip drilling out of the bill last month after 25 Republicans signed a letter demanding it.

That further emboldened moderate Republicans. Now that Republican leaders are hoping to reinsert the ANWR provision into the final bill, the GOP opponents of ANWR are holding firm.

“We’re assuming that ANWR will be out of the bill,” said Rep. Nancy Johnson, R-Conn.

In a longshot bid to keep the drilling provision alive, Republicans are seeking out House Democrats to see if there are ways to persuade them to support the broader budget bill. The top targets are the 30 or so Democrats who support ANWR drilling as a stand-alone measure, as well as Gulf Coast lawmakers desperate for financial help for their constituents.

But there’s no indication the Republicans are making headway with House Democrats, none of whom voted for the budget plan the first time around last month. They oppose the bill for cuts to Medicaid, student loan subsidies and food stamps, among other provisions. And they complain that the budget cut bill, when coupled with companion tax bills, actually leads to an increase in the deficit.

“I can’t trade Medicaid cuts for being able to open up ANWR,” said Rep. Gene Green, D-Texas, an oil industry supporter.

Some Democrats, however, haven’t shut to the door to such overtures. Reps. Charles Melancon of Louisiana and Gene Taylor of Mississippi, for example, are demanding immediate relief for their hurricane-ravaged constituents rather than the longer-term aid being offered so far.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., said the GOP plan to lure Democratic votes isn’t working. She said several lawmakers have “come to me and said, ‘They’ve approached me. I want you to know I won’t have anything to do with it.”‘

 

 

 

 

Friday 12/9/2005 DAILY NEWS DIGEST

Filed under: Uncategorized — G @ 7:36 am

http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/news/11341237113040.xml&coll=2 - Ethics Commission case hinges on definition of “personal gain.”

http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/news/11341235203041.xml&coll=2 – State Education Board says some schools given failing grade based upon errors in grading students’ scores.

http://www.al.com/news/mobileregister/index.ssf?/base/news/11341233603050.xml&coll=3 – State’s largest natural gas providers agree to voluntarily freeze prices for residential customers through March.

http://www.al.com/news/mobileregister/index.ssf?/base/news/11341234343050.xml&coll=3 – Revenue Department attempts to explain $3.35 million legal bill paid to firm of former staffer.

http://www.al.com/news/huntsvilletimes/index.ssf?/base/news/11341234473270.xml&coll=1 – State Superintendent calls for lengthening school year.

http://www.al.com/opinion/huntsvilletimes/index.ssf?/base/opinion/11341234113270.xml&coll=1&thispage=1 – Editorial blasts legislators who will not address amendment to remove racist language from the constitution because it is too “controversial” for an election year.

http://www.al.com/opinion/huntsvilletimes/index.ssf?/base/opinion/11341233783270.xml&coll=1 – Commentary by Mo Brooks, candidate for lt. governor’s post, calls for laws to punish employers for hiring undocumented immigrants.

http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051209/OPINION01/512080373/1012/OPINION - Editorial praises decision by senators not to pursue removal of pro tem Lowell Barron in ’06 session, but calls for changes in rule in ’07 to allow simple majority to remove pro tem.

http://www.oanow.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=OAN%2FMGArticle%2FOAN_BasicArticle&c=MGArticle&cid=1128768607878&path=%21editorials%21index.html – Editorial opposes proposal to teach course on influence of Bible in public schools.

FROM TODAY’S ANNISTON STAR:

A ghostly visit

In our opinion
12-09-2005

We saw a vision of the Ghost of Tax Reform Battles Past this week.

Let us explain. Alabama Arise wishes to correct the way the state collects taxes. Income taxes here are levied against folks making as little as $4,600 a year, a pitifully tiny amount. It’s the lowest in the nation. As one UA law professor so eloquently has pointed out, it defies the teachings of Christ.

Arise’s plan raises the $4,600 minimum and reduces the burden for 60 percent of taxpayers while hiking taxes on the top 20 percent. The proposal aims for fairness and applies the principle that “of whom much is given, much is required,” a hallmark of all progressive tax codes.

Reading over a Thursday Mobile Register news story about Alabama Arise’s latest proposal, we heard the rattling chains of the Ghost of Tax Reform Battles Past.

“It’s a little disingenuous to talk about tax reform when it’s really a tax increase,” he said, while taking the form of Christian Coalition President John Giles.

Giles is right, up to a point.

If we are to treat the poor fairly and at the same time provide all citizens the health, education, economic promotion and personal security a state should, someone has to pay for it. In most states the heaviest burden falls on those who are most able to pay.

Not in Alabama.

In Alabama, the heaviest burden falls on the poor.

And John Giles and the Christian Coalition of Alabama want to keep it that way.

So who is being disingenuous?

U.S. House votes to extend tax cuts

By James Kuhnhenn
Knight Ridder Newspapers

12-09-2005

WASHINGTON — Shrugging off concern that they’d swell the federal budget deficit, the House of Representatives voted Thursday to extend a series of tax cuts from President Bush’s first term, arguing that the lower rates are crucial to sustain a rebounding economy.

The House voted 234-197 for tax reductions that would benefit mainly businesses and investors and would cost the Treasury $56.1 billion over five years. Together with three other tax cuts that the House approved Wednesday, the package would cost the Treasury $94.5 billion over five years, nearly twice as much as the $50 billion five-year spending reductions that the House adopted last month.

Even without these tax reductions, the deficit is projected to total $314 billion in fiscal 2006, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. The House tax cuts could make the deficit bigger, even as lawmakers expect to spend perhaps $100 billion more on Iraq next year and billions more in relief to the hurricane-ravaged Gulf Coast states.

The House voted mainly along partisan lines, with Republicans for the cuts and Democrats against.

Democrats accused Republicans of granting the tax reductions primarily to the wealthy only weeks after adopting budget cuts that slowed spending on anti-poverty programs. They portrayed Republicans as Grinches for acting on the twin pieces of legislation so close to Christmas.

“The combination of their tax bill and their budget bill … is increasing the deficit … in order to give tax cuts to the wealthiest Americans (and) they are putting the burden of debt on American’s children,” said House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Republicans argued that the tax reductions, particularly for capital gains, have spurred the economy, created jobs and generated more revenues for the federal Treasury. Without the extension, the 15 percent tax rate on capital gains would expire at the end of 2008 and rise to 20 percent.

“At these lower tax rates we increased revenues to the federal government,” said Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis. “Last year revenues went up 14 percent. What happened to the deficit? The deficit projection in 2004 was $521 billion. What is the deficit now? The deficit now is $319 billion.”

Treasury revenues rose as the economy recovered, but economists differ on how capital-gains taxes affect economic growth. An analysis last month by the Tax Policy Center, a liberal research institute, said studies showed that during the last 50 years, “capital gains rates display no contemporaneous correlation with real GDP growth.”

Brian Riedl, a budget analyst at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative research center, defended the House action, saying that allowing the lower tax rates to expire could place a drag on the economy. “Historically, raising such tax rates has not only reduced economic growth, it has reduced (federal) revenues,” he said.

Independent budget analysts complained that the House vote illustrated Congress’ inability to cope with deficits and the rising costs of entitlement programs such as Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security.

“The bigger context here is that the fiscal impact of the baby boomers’ retirement is just a few years away,” said Robert Bixby of the Concord Coalition, a bipartisan fiscal watchdog group. “We’re in a fool’s paradise.”

Riedl of the Heritage Foundation agreed that Congress should confront difficult changes in entitlements. The budget cuts approved so far are “not even a rounding error on our long-term fiscal problems,” he said. “Everything on the tax and spending side is just working around the edges of the edge.”

House and Senate negotiators still are working out the differences on their respective spending reductions; the House approved $50 billion over five years, the Senate $35 billion over the same period.

Though some House Republicans worried last month about voting to reduce taxes immediately after cutting spending, most of the party’s moderates lined up Thursday to support the tax cuts.

The House action sets up a difficult negotiation with the Senate, which passed a different series of tax-reduction extensions last month.

A key component of the House bill is a two-year extension, to 2010, of the lower rates on capital gains - profits from sales of assets such as stocks, bonds or homes - and corporate dividends.

The Senate, under pressure from Republican moderates, kept that provision out of its $57.8 billion tax-cut bill. With little time to work out the differences this year, the House and Senate aren’t expected to have a final compromise package until February at the earliest.

Thursday 12/8/2005 DAILY NEWS DIGEST

Filed under: Uncategorized — Danny @ 7:33 am

http://www.al.com/news/birminghamnews/index.ssf?/base/news/1134037336160350.xml&coll=2 – Ethics Commission votes to continue investigation of Sen. Hank Sanders.

http://www.al.com/opinion/birminghamnews/rdemonia.ssf?/base/opinion/113369141628060.xml&coll=2 – Robin DeMonia’s commentary as the nation executes its 1,000th person since 1977 focuses on four Alabama executions.

http://www.al.com/news/mobileregister/index.ssf?/base/news/1134036972160340.xml&coll=3 – Article outlines Arise’s tax reform plans; Christian Coalition calls proposal a tax increase and says legislature will reject the plan.

http://www.montgomeryadvertiser.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051208/NEWS02/512080337/1009 - Alabama receives “F” in science standards for primary and secondary school students.

FROM TODAY’S ANNISTON STAR:

House Republicans look at ending birthright citizenship for immigrants

By Jim Puzzanghera
Knight Ridder Newspapers
12-08-2005

 

 

&ltimg&gt  

WASHINGTON — It’s been a cornerstone of American law since shortly after the Civil War: Children born in the United States become citizens, even if their parents are here illegally.

Now some conservatives are taking aim at that birthright.

They call the U.S.-born children of illegal immigrants "anchor babies" because at age 18 the children can apply to bring other family members here from abroad, and a growing group of House Republicans wants to change the policy. They hope to add a provision to the immigration bill that the House of Representatives will consider next week that would deny citizenship to those children.

"They see people are coming here simply for the purpose of having a child here and then, because they’re the anchor, they can have all the family come in on that child’s ticket … There are thousands upon thousands of people who are doing it," said Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., a leading opponent of illegal immigration. He cited "surprising" momentum behind the plan. A House bill to make the policy change has 77 co-sponsors.

Because of widespread opposition in the House and even more in the Senate, the measure is unlikely to become law, and would face a constitutional challenge in court if it did. But it promises to make the debate over illegal immigration even more divisive and could reverberate in next year’s midterm elections.

"To change the way we establish citizenship is such an extreme measure, and it makes you really question what is motivating people to come up with those ideas," said Rep. Charlie Gonzalez, D-Texas, whose grandparents emigrated from Mexico. "It just goes counter to what we are as a people, and I think it does great harm."

According to the Constitution’s 14th Amendment, ratified in 1868 to give former slaves U.S. citizenship, "all persons born or naturalized in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."

Tancredo said citizens of other countries are not subject to U.S. jurisdiction, and he added that drafters of the 14th Amendment did not intend it to apply to children of illegal immigrants.

 

Pretty much an experiment

Filed under: Uncategorized — Danny @ 1:58 am

And we’ll see how it goes…

« Newer Entries

Powered by WordPress

Close
E-mail It